Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Times Climbing l'Alpe d'huez

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-09.-2004, 08:56 PM   #16
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: Times Climbing l'Alpe d'huez

I am not sure about the statement that Coppi was using a fixed wheel back in 1952.
Certainly the derailleur had been in use in the TDF since 1937 - so I would expect that he did have some gear selections.
But nothing like the range of gears that they have today.
Also remember Coppi would have been using a heavier bike and the road surface would have been terrible in comparison to today.
This makes Coppi's performance all the greater.
48 mins.

Myfriend climbed D'Huez in August - he cannot cycle at all but fancied having a go.
It took him 2hrs 3mins to climb the 14 kms.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09.-2004, 09:34 AM   #17
ilpirata
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 333
Default Re: Times Climbing l'Alpe d'huez

I must say that the supposition that Indurain's time in 95 would have been better if he hadn't waited so long, is rather silly. Perhaps we need to take time measurements starting from halfway up? In any event the rider who takes off in a breakaway attempt takes all the risk, and that anaerobic initial stress he will eventually pay for. But he needs to assure he has surprised his adversaries so that no one is on his wheel benifiting. Thus the great champion Indurain shows his greatness in limiting damage, but to say more is; as i say silly.



Quote:
Originally Posted by sopas
I agree with you that many factors must be taken into consideration when comparing times over different years. Specially if they attacked at the beginning of the climb or later since we all assume they go at 100% in the ITT. Armstrong climbing in 2001 was absolutely incredible, did he attack from the bottom? I don't remember, and what about Ulrich in 97? did the German attack from the bottom?

I think this is very important. Just look at Indurain/Zulle time in 1995 (time 39:28). Indurain did not chase Pantani from the bottom but only later on the climb, but once he put pressure the gap with Pantani did no increase anymore (in fact it was reduced from 1:30 to 1:24!!). So I think it is fair to say that if Indurain had not let Pantani go at first his time would have been better.
ilpirata is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2004, 02:14 AM   #18
sopas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Spain
Posts: 229
Default Re: Times Climbing l'Alpe d'huez

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilpirata
I must say that the supposition that Indurain's time in 95 would have been better if he hadn't waited so long, is rather silly. Perhaps we need to take time measurements starting from halfway up? In any event the rider who takes off in a breakaway attempt takes all the risk, and that anaerobic initial stress he will eventually pay for. But he needs to assure he has surprised his adversaries so that no one is on his wheel benifiting. Thus the great champion Indurain shows his greatness in limiting damage, but to say more is; as i say silly.

Yes, but we have to remember that Pantani was not an overall contender for the General classification that year and he was many minutes back on Indurain. Actually Indurain did not need to attack that day. The reality is that even if Pantani had tanken 3 minutes on Indurain that day he wouln't have won the 95 TdF. Indurain's real enemies that year were Zulle and Riis, and both were having a hard time to maintain Indurain's path on the climb to L'Alple d'huez. I wonder what we could see if Pantani were only 2-3 minutes behind Indurain on the General Classification that day. Miguel could not have afforded then to let Pantani go from the bottom and risk the yellow jersey. Whether Miguel could manage to arrive to the top with Pantani or not is another story. I think Pantani would have won the stage anyway (since he is better sprinter than Miguel) but only by 20-30 seconds. However this is all open to speculation.
sopas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2004, 04:29 AM   #19
dbrower
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Times Climbing l'Alpe d'huez

Quote:
Originally Posted by sopas
Actually Indurain did not need to attack that day. The reality is that even if Pantani had tanken 3 minutes on Indurain that day he wouln't have won the 95 TdF. Indurain's real enemies that year were Zulle and Riis, and both were having a hard time to maintain Indurain's path on the climb to L'Alple d'huez.
I don't think it was about chasing Pantani as much as it was about burying the GC riders behind. With Pantani as a Rabbit, Mig had a target for motivation.

-dB
dbrower is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:07 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet