![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,806
|
Quote:
I think you've got it the wrong way around.. From the site mentioned above: "The wide-spread ANSI approved helmet Bell V1 Pro gains around 9.8% compared to a bald head" The context is "increasing aero drag", so it basically states that wearing an approved aero helmet is aerodynamically worse than a bald head by 9.8%. Also, you can't calculate a performance increase/decrease of x% based on the drag increase/decrease of x%. The drag percentage isn't directly related to speed. So 5% better aerodynamics isn't necessarily 5% faster.. Also quoting that site: "New wheels offer the largest aerodynamic advantage with the bicycle" but it goes on to mention front disc problems in winds and the cost. So, maybe you could get a better helmet if you can afford it and swap your spokes for bladded ones and maybe some deep, aero rims? hippy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 40
|
Hippy.. no a standard helmet has worse aero drag than a bald head, a good aero helmet has much better drag than a bald head. As for speed increases, since drag is proportional to velocity cubed, a 10% reduction in drag would cause a 3% increase in speed at constant power. air drag (watts)= VA*VA*VG*0.5*air density (in kg per cubic meter) *frontal area (in meters squared)*drag coefficient (dimensionless number) Va is air velocity, Vg is ground velocity, in meters-sec of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,806
|
Quote:
Yep, as per: "The Bell Stratos, an ANSI approved helmet, increases the aero drag by approximately 1.3 % over a bald head." and: "Aero helmets, as they are used for racing, which do not however meet the ANSI safety requirements, reduce the aero drag by approximately 2% compared to a bald head or a rubber cap over the hair." But I'm not sure I'd call 2% drag reduction "much better" than a bald head. Maybe at the elite level 2% is a lot, but not for me ![]() Anyway, 2% less drag is MUCH less benefit than the 5% _time_ benefit some people were calculating. It's only a 2% _drag_ decrease which is NOT 2% speed increase. Ahh.. too much maths not enough riding! ![]() hippy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
|
That Bell (razor?) that the Kiwi rode in the pursuit is cool. You don't see many of those around anymore. I've always been curious why Bell stopped making them. Also, why Troxel stopped making the radius titanium. Both really cool lids from the mid 90's.
__________________
www.leifclarke.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4
|
At the Junior Worlds, some of the German team members had some pretty cool lids. I wasn't able to catch the brand, but they looked more like skate helmets but had no vents and a visor. Not so much aero as a classic round helmet. They really looked ideal for the mass-start track events. Can anyone shed any more info (brand names, retail ordering, etc)?
|
|
|
|