![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <q42Ec.36089$zS.33980@fe17.usenetserver.com>,
hippy <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote: > How do we know, once > positive results stop being found, that the athletes haven't simply > discovered a non-detectable drug? None of the current "scandals" involve positive drug tests anyway -- they're all based on admissions, phone taps, searches, etc. The expression "I've never tested positive" is becoming one of the most meaningless in sport. -- Shane Stanley |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tamyka Bell wrote:
> > The huge Australian heavyweight weightlifting Gold medallist > > (tuna fisherman) who went back to being a "90lb weakling" > > after he finished competition? > Yeah that one is a bit sus, don't know the reference, maybe he got CFS > or something? That was Dean Luken (sp?) He 'got' 7 years for Amphetmine importing/trafficking Hence his loss of weight. -- |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hippy wrote:
> How do we know, once positive results stop being found, that the > athletes haven't simply discovered a non-detectable drug? hippy Most drugs are non-detectable over a certain time-frame. Exogenous EPO can't be detected by any current test after about 2 weeks. Riders go to Spain, or Mexico, South America or Asia, shoot up and train, and come back in a little while to race and test totally clean. Athletes don't need to discover non-detectable drugs when they can second guess the testers and it clears their system quickly anyway. And don't think that because the drugs leave their system they are no longer an advantage - drug takers increase their capacity to train, and so get fitness benefits that last much longer than the time it takes the drugs to leave their body. And then there are the 'non-detectables' like insulin-like growth factors and human (and other forms of) growth hormones. There are also many other borderline cases like testosterone and some anabolics which are detectable in certain dosages over certain timeframes. I say blood and urine test every athlete once a week every week from 6 weeks out from Athens until they have competed, and see who wins then. Maybe that's not practical, but if the testers want to get smart, pre- competition testing for some athletes is essential in the 6-1 week prior time period. -- |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>Originally posted by Roadie_scum
<snip> >I say blood and urine test every athlete once a week every >week from 6 >weeks out from Athens until they have competed, >and see who wins then. >Maybe that's not practical, but if the >testers want to get smart, pre- >competition testing for some >athletes is essential in the 6-1 week >prior time period. With a seemingly impossible task like this, would it be better to just let athletes free-for-all? If it's so easy to cheat and "test clean" - why spend all this money on testing? Why not just let them all do whatever they want and risk their own lives? They are still catching people so maybe druggie prep isn't quite at 100% yet - the athletes need more practice with quantities and timeframes? Once they start pooling data though, they are going be totally undetectable and then it'll take huge dollars to reveal the cheats.. It's all so frustrating (for me at least!) to see some people getting away with it and some being caught. Either test them so often there is no chance of cheating or don't test at all! Arr! Maybe all future Olympics should be like Big Brother... lock all the athletes in a building with enough food and drink for a year and don't let anything else in. They train for 12 months with what they've got 'inside' and then they compete. It would be similar to having control tyres and control engines as in some forms of car racing... -- |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hippy wrote:
> Maybe all future Olympics should be like Big Brother... lock all the > athletes in a building with enough food and drink for a year and don't > let anything else in. They train for 12 months with what they've got > 'inside' and then they compete. It would be similar to having control > tyres and control engines as in some forms of car racing... Brilliant! But they'd probably go tribal and eat each other for post-ride protein- loading... -- |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hippy wrote:
> > >Originally posted by Roadie_scum > <snip> > >I say blood and urine test every athlete once a week every >week from 6 > >weeks out from Athens until they have competed, >and see who wins then. > >Maybe that's not practical, but if the >testers want to get smart, pre- > >competition testing for some >athletes is essential in the 6-1 week > >prior time period. > > With a seemingly impossible task like this, would it be better to just > let athletes free-for-all? > <snip> It'd be a shame to disadvantage honest athletes by doing that. Maybe we should stop kidding ourselves and do like in bodybuilding - introduce a natural's category in all sports! T |
|