![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#76 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dennis P. Harris wrote:
> you probably haven't yet been screwed by the insurance > slimeballs. once you have, you'll be singing a different tune. I used to be a carpenter, and helped build an insurance office once. I have NEVER EVER seen so much money poured into offices in my life. These fuckers had oak and cherry ceilings, hugely expensive fixtures, it was amazing. They obviously had WAY TOO MUCH MONEY to throw away. |
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> The bottom line is that I'm ok, ...
=v= You don't know that until you've been checked over by a doctor. Seriously. =v= Also, you probably shouldn't declare such information in a public newsgroup, which the motorist's insurance company's lawyers might possibly be reading. <_Jym_> |
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> There are guidelines and standard procedures for these kinds
> of things. You are entitled to almost immediate reimbursement > for your property losses and, on top of that, anything from > three to five times your medical bills, lost wages and the > like. =v= This is true. You can go into pre-trial mediation and be told that, and come to an agreement. But perhaps the insurance company's lawyers will pull last-minute tricks, make lowballing offers (threatening to take it to trial), etc. THAT IS THEIR JOB. They exist solely to make the insurance company's payouts as low as they can get away with. =v= You seem to have been lucky. That doesn't mean others have been or will be. <_Jym_> |
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>> I'm sick of all the litigious bastards in this country!
> Worth repeating. =v= Repetition is mindless. The spectre of "all the litigious bastards" is a bogus one. No doubt somebody's going to pull out the McDonald's canard somewhere in this thread huh? =v= I'm all for people and institutions being accountable for the consequences of their actions. Establishment interests in the U.S. manage to avoid accountability to an astonishing degree, but occasionally -- and it ought to be stressed that we're talking about only a *fraction* of incidents -- a jury of citizens will try to hold a guilty party accountable. It doesn't happen much, but when it does, we get heavy-duty squawking about litigation out of control and a need for tort "reform" and mindless parroting of that on Usenet. <_Jym_> |
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"sittingduck" <email.to.sitting-duck@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message news:Xns94E368D96E8E8duckrulestheuniverse@140.99.99.130... > Dennis P. Harris wrote: > > > you probably haven't yet been screwed by the insurance > > slimeballs. once you have, you'll be singing a different tune. > > I used to be a carpenter, and helped build an insurance office once. > > I have NEVER EVER seen so much money poured into offices in my life. These > fuckers had oak and cherry ceilings, hugely expensive fixtures, it was > amazing. They obviously had WAY TOO MUCH MONEY to throw away. Excuse me, but was that money really "thrown away"? Wasn't it used to buy products manufactured by people and to employ builders, electricians, plumbers and, yes, carpenters such as yourself, thus putting money into the economy? Would it have been better for them to buy cheap furniture from China perhaps and install it themselves? Pat in TX |
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pat wrote:
> Excuse me, but was that money really "thrown away"? Wasn't it used to buy > products manufactured by people and to employ builders, electricians, > plumbers and, yes, carpenters such as yourself, thus putting money into the > economy? Would it have been better for them to buy cheap furniture from > China perhaps and install it themselves? I was using it to illustrate the point that insurance is a very lucrative business. The rates everyone pays support their opulence. If you are happy lining their pockets, so be it. I for one, AM NOT. |
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> > I was using it to illustrate the point that insurance is a very lucrative > business. The rates everyone pays support their opulence. If you are happy > lining their pockets, so be it. I for one, AM NOT. Nobody is forcing you to buy insurance. So put your money where your mouth is and don't buy it!! It's that simple. Step up. Pat in TX |
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pat wrote:
> Nobody is forcing you to buy insurance. So put your money where your mouth > is and don't buy it!! It's that simple. Step up. Nobody is forcing you to use any common sense or logic either.... So far you are doing really well without it. |
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pat wrote:
> > Nobody is forcing you to buy insurance. I take it you don't live in California? Bill "only health insurance by choice" S. |
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> > > Nobody is forcing you to buy insurance. So put your money where your mouth > > is and don't buy it!! It's that simple. Step up. > > Nobody is forcing you to use any common sense or logic either.... > > So far you are doing really well without it. Oh yeah? Explain that. You can put up a surety bond and go without insurance. All you want to do is complain. Pat in TX |
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sat, 08 May 2004 12:09:22 GMT in rec.bicycles.misc, "curt"
<nospam@verizon.net> wrote: > I personally could care less about the terms of my insurance company. I > know that is a racket and we are forced into having to pay some outrageous > amount of money every year. > then i guess that you won't care when they cancel your policy when they find out you didn't report an accident and you become a high-risk pool candidate, with even more exhorbitant rates. |
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Pat" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:2g468fF45ptdU1@uni-berlin.de... > > > It is done all the time. You report something to an Insurance company > your rates will go up and you will end up paying more in the long run. I > would never report anything to my insurance company unless it was a very big > accident. You would be a fool to do so, unless you are the type of person > to roll over credit card debt all the time. > > > > Curt > > Sure, it's done all the time, but the insurance companies have rules against > it. Somewhere in your insurance contract, it says you are required to > report ALL accidents. lf not, they could cancel your insurance because of > suspected fraud from your side. > > Pat in TX That may be Pat, but there is no way in hell that I would adhere to that. I don't care if it breaking the law or not. The only reason they put that in is so they can raise my insurance rates. I personally think that should be illegal for insurance companies to have that in there. They have us where they want us as it is let alone telling us we can't pay for a wreck if we want to. I certainly don't like insurance companies, so I guess that is why I would see what the person who hit me wants to do first. If it goes through her insurance I would wait and see what they offer. If it is a bad offer, then I would counter and if they don't listen then I would threaten that I will hire an attorney and that works for me. If I need an attorney in the end, I can always hire one. I am not dumb enough to sign anything unless I want to. Curt |
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have not looked into self insuring for years, but last time I looked you
had to put up $20,000 and just let is sit there collecting no interest or anything. Now that may have changed, but I doubt it. Also, if you self insure you are taking too big of a risk with the way Americans are sue happy. As you can tell by the responses here, you can not self insure anymore. People have changed too much in this country. It has become very very aggressive. It is apparent in the cars we drive (huge SUV's) and the way we drive....aggressively. People don't have time for anything around here. Everyone is in a huge rush to get nowhere and when you met someone on the street now, they look at you as competition instead of a possible friend. Enjoy, Curt "Pat" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:2g46daF4b5j1U1@uni-berlin.de... > > > > > Wow, and I thought I had a bad view of what America is like. I guess you > > feel most folks are really trying to stick it to you. You are probably > > right. I should follow the masses and file a law suit to see how much I > can > > get. > > > > I personally could care less about the terms of my insurance company. I > > know that is a racket and we are forced into having to pay some outrageous > > amount of money every year. > > > > Curt > > 1. you DO have an unwarranted bad view of what America is like. > 2. you may not care about the terms of your insurance company, but you have > to realize that the insurance company cares a great deal. Go ahead and not > file--but this could come back to bite you in the end. > 3. if you think it's a "racket" then Self-Insure. It's done all the time, > too. Put your money up front to self-insure your belongings and forget about > the insurance companies. It's your choice, after all. > > Pat in TX > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Dennis P. Harris" <NO_SPAM_TO_dpharris@gci.net> wrote in message news lnr90dccglqn32p8dpmpa64e5782sh63g@4ax.com...> On Sat, 08 May 2004 12:09:22 GMT in rec.bicycles.misc, "curt" > <nospam@verizon.net> wrote: > > > I personally could care less about the terms of my insurance company. I > > know that is a racket and we are forced into having to pay some outrageous > > amount of money every year. > > > then i guess that you won't care when they cancel your policy > when they find out you didn't report an accident and you become a > high-risk pool candidate, with even more exhorbitant rates. I have no idea how they could ever find out. It is no ones business, but my own. If they some how do find out, I will tell them to stick it up theirs and then I will have to self insure. Curt |
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
McDonalds has the best fast food coffee IMHO. I think Starbucks is not hot
enough, because I like cream in my coffee and then it is luke warm because it wasn't hot enough in the first place. Also, Starbucks is very expensive! Curt "Curtis L. Russell" <curtis@the-md-russells.org> wrote in message news:0orp90h6pv38aemac7qq36i1lh05ipckcd@4ax.com... > On Sat, 08 May 2004 12:11:14 GMT, "curt" <nospam@verizon.net> wrote: > > >Maybe she should know the coffee is hot and not to spill it on herself. > >Should we now all drink moderately warm coffee because she is an idiot? > > Well, as a black coffee drinker from many sources, so somewhat > familiar with the various temperatures as handed across the counter > (my wife immediately drops enough cream stuff in it to bring it to > luke warm), McDonalds coffee is and always has been (or at least back > to 1967 when I was a shift manager at one in Lansing) hotter than > practically any other source. McDonalds coffee is the one that is > often too hot to drink AFTER driving 20 miles down the road and one > more reason to not go to McDonalds. > > There was and is no good reason to have the coffee that hot. It > doesn't make the coffee better - on the contrary, it leads to that > oily and quick to go off-fresh flavor common to McDs coffee. And McDs > knew that. > > The $ 400,000 - $ 500,000 she finally got was a fair amount and maybe > enough to get McDs recalibrate their equipment. > > FWIW, Starbucks coffee has to be at least 20 degrees or more cooler, > and they do fine in selling coffee. > > Curtis L. Russell > Odenton, MD (USA) > Just someone on two wheels... |
|