![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <8b4b7de4.0404221228.15b21eeb@posting.google.com>,
chumpychump@hotmail.com (Chalo) wrote: > Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote: > > > Hey Chalo, you'll like my latest thought-experiment: a hub-geared BMX > > with a tall seat, flat or drop bars, and high-pressure tires. It will be > > the world's lousiest folding bike (doesn't fold, y'see), or a great way > > of gaming airline bike-handling rules. > > That's almost the bike I've been building for one of my co-workers. > He aimed for "world's lightest BMX bike" but eventually came to rest > on "possibly world's most expensive BMX bike". > > It's an aluminum monocoque BMX race frame carefully jacked open and > milled to accept a SRAM 5-speed hub with drum brake. Both hubs are > laced to 20" Velocity Deep-Vs with 110psi slicks. Carbon fork, > aluminum handlebars, Race Face Next LP cranks, Speedplay pedals. Long > 31.6mm seatpost. Projected complete weight: 20 pounds. Weird! Wonderful! Any likely bugbears? Why did you decide on the 5-speed hub, as opposed to the 7? Or, for that matter the Rohloff, since that would get you closer to your new goal .I'll probably be starting out with a steel frame from the attic, so I don't anticipate as many issues with frame spreading and such. I'm not obsessed about the weight or aerodynamics; I want a bike that is sort of a fast-as-possible cheap-and-transportable bike, or maybe a death-metal Moulton. Hm. Since I'm going to an island with a lot of stair steps, maybe I should get a suspension fork and really go to town. > The front end of a 20" bike is so short, drop bars would be a sick > joke. Flat bars or cowhorns would give a time-trial/pursuit kind of > riding position. Interesting thoughts. I'm thinking a flat bar (maybe with my bolt-on aero bars brought along for extra sickness) would be the way to go. I suppose there's no real reason to not use the stock BMX-style handlebars, is there? Besides looks? > Certainly this bike would be mind-bogglingly easier to travel with > than any of my own bikes. Seems to me that a BMX or cruiser might work for your travelling needs. I bet even a Co-Motion-style traveling road/mtb frame would be awfully big in your sizes. Clearly a case where compact geometry would be functional .I hope you'll post pictures of this project when you're done. Sounds like a case of wretched excess at its finest. This is a really, really admirable project. I think you should send some shots to a BMX magazine or two when you've finished. Or maybe just Chunk 666. -- Ryan Cousineau, rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/ President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <8b4b7de4.0404211543.562929db@posting.google.com>,
chumpychump@hotmail.com says... > > >Pete Cresswell wrote: >> >> Chalo wrote: >> >The SRAM/Sachs Spectro 7 is noticeably freer-running. And the middle >> >gear is direct-drive. >> >> Any feeling for how Roloff's hub compares? > >It's more like the Sachs than like the Shimano in that regard. Just >fiddling with the hub in my hands, my impression is that it's got more >internal drag than the Spectro, but on the street it's very hard to >tell. The Rohloff makes more noise and thus makes me feel like it's >draggier, but that could well be a misconception. > >The Shimano Nexus 7 is pretty quiet, has a decent brake, shifts >quickly and reliably, stashes all its shifting hardware inboard of the >dropouts, and dissipates a lot of energy. I doubt that the Nexus 8 is >too different, but I've never seen one so I can't say. The subject line says Nexus 8, but everyone is talking about the Nexus 7. Has anyone tried the new Nexus 8? It is supposed to be more efficient than the Nexus 7. ------------ Alex |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote:
> > chumpychump@hotmail.com (Chalo) wrote: > > > > It's an aluminum monocoque BMX race frame carefully jacked open and > > milled to accept a SRAM 5-speed hub with drum brake. Both hubs are > > laced to 20" Velocity Deep-Vs with 110psi slicks. Carbon fork, > > aluminum handlebars, Race Face Next LP cranks, Speedplay pedals. Long > > 31.6mm seatpost. Projected complete weight: 20 pounds. > > Why did you decide on the 5-speed hub, as opposed to the 7? Or, for that > matter the Rohloff, since that would get you closer to your new goal .It looked likelier to be able to spread the stays from 110mm to 126mm than to 135mm. I was rooting for a coaster brake model which would have made it 122mm, but my pal liked the idea of a drum. Heck, *I* like a drum on a 20" wheel! The machining part of the operation was to remove a wall surrounding the dropout slot, in order to provide clearance for the shifter clickbox. > I want a bike that is sort of > a fast-as-possible cheap-and-transportable bike, or maybe a death-metal > Moulton. Hm. Since I'm going to an island with a lot of stair steps, > maybe I should get a suspension fork and really go to town. I highly recommend the Primo Comet tire: file treaded, rated at 110psi, and available in 1.35, 1.95, and 2.1 nominal widths. The big one compensates pretty well for the small wheel diameter. Suspension fork? Sounds like a request for your nearest bike recycler. There are not many new 20" suspension forks that outclass the ones found on the nicer major-brand kid-sized MTBs. AFAIK White Brothers are the only outfit to offer a sophisticated 20" suspension fork, which is pricey and not likely to suit your application better than a steel-tubed spring/elastomer job. > > The front end of a 20" bike is so short, drop bars would be a sick > > joke. Flat bars or cowhorns would give a time-trial/pursuit kind of > > riding position. > > Interesting thoughts. I'm thinking a flat bar (maybe with my bolt-on > aero bars brought along for extra sickness) would be the way to go. I > suppose there's no real reason to not use the stock BMX-style > handlebars, is there? Besides looks? Not really. They are stiffer and stronger than cantilevered bars, but much heavier. Typically you'll get 7" of rise from BMX bars but none from the stem, whereas you could use flat bars and MTB stem for less rise but more reach options. Chalo Colina |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Alex Rodriguez <adr5@columbia.edu> wrote:
> The subject line says Nexus 8, but everyone is talking about the Nexus 7. > Has anyone tried the new Nexus 8? It is supposed to be more efficient than > the Nexus 7. Well, Biopace was supposed to be more efficient than round rings.... The Nexus 8 actually has a direct-drive gear, right above the middle of the range where it could prove very useful. Even if the gears and bearings are what we have come to expect from Shimano Nexus equipment, that one change could be of benefit. Chalo Colina |
|