![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've been working on building up a fixed gear bicycle from scrounged parts for a while now, and I finally got it ride-able the other day. The frame was rusty when I found it, and the rear triangle was bent. Here's what it looks like now, after I finished painting the frame (old paint and rust cleaned off with a wire brush wheel on a drill): http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie1a.jpg http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie2a.jpg It still needs bar tape, and probably a back brake (it's got just a regular freewheel hub with the cog and a BB lockring screwed on). The gearing seems to be okay, if a little high for some hills; it's a 40x14 with 175mm cranks (yeah, I know they're long, but I couldn't find any shorter ones I liked and pedal strikes don't seem to be a problem -- the pedals strike at just a bit shy of 45 degrees lean.) I've got some toe clips waiting for it, too. The brakes barely fit with the top of the pads shaved off -- the frame was evidently made for 27" wheels. -- Benjamin Lewis Reader, suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Benjamin Lewis" <bclewis@cs.sfu.ca> wrote in message
news:yy7osmfc9vix.fsf@css.css.sfu.ca... > > > The brakes barely fit with the top of the pads shaved off -- the frame was > evidently made for 27" wheels. > There are such things as "long reach" brakes, where the arms are longer. I scrounged a pair off a bike abandoned at the curb -- but I'm keeping them in case I need to convert my 27 incher to a 700 some day due to parts availability. Sheldon Brown, master of the workaround, has a solution you might be interested in. http://www.sheldonbrown.com/home-drop.html |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <yy7osmfc9vix.fsf@css.css.sfu.ca>,
Benjamin Lewis <bclewis@cs.sfu.ca> wrote: > I've been working on building up a fixed gear bicycle from scrounged parts > for a while now, and I finally got it ride-able the other day. The frame > was rusty when I found it, and the rear triangle was bent. > > Here's what it looks like now, after I finished painting the frame (old > paint and rust cleaned off with a wire brush wheel on a drill): > > http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie1a.jpg > http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie2a.jpg > > It still needs bar tape, and probably a back brake (it's got just a regular > freewheel hub with the cog and a BB lockring screwed on). The gearing > seems to be okay, if a little high for some hills; it's a 40x14 with 175mm > cranks (yeah, I know they're long, but I couldn't find any shorter ones I > liked and pedal strikes don't seem to be a problem -- the pedals strike at > just a bit shy of 45 degrees lean.) > > I've got some toe clips waiting for it, too. > > The brakes barely fit with the top of the pads shaved off -- the frame was > evidently made for 27" wheels. That thing looks really nice! Makes my similar Apollo conversion look like junk. Now I just have to check the gearing on mine; I think I'm using like a 50x14, which may explain why I find it a pain to ride. -- Ryan Cousineau, rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/ President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote in
news:rcousine-13F959.09024310042004@morgoth.sfu.ca: > That thing looks really nice! Makes my similar Apollo conversion > look like junk. > > Now I just have to check the gearing on mine; I think I'm using > like a 50x14, which may explain why I find it a pain to ride. > Ryan, I ride mine a lot and use a 42x16 which seems to be just about right for the average hills around the city although it would be a bit of a grind up SFU hill. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Benjamin Lewis wrote:
> I've been working on building up a fixed gear bicycle from scrounged > parts for a while now, and I finally got it ride-able the other day. > The frame was rusty when I found it, and the rear triangle was bent. > > Here's what it looks like now, after I finished painting the frame (old > paint and rust cleaned off with a wire brush wheel on a drill): > > http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie1a.jpg > http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie2a.jpg That's a nice looking bike! Can you share a little about how you did the painting? (It sounds like you did it yourself?) I am interesting in painting some frames I have scrounged, and would be very happy with those results. I am wondering about primers, brands of paint, topcoats etc. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <Xns94C76E1BF546Bmikelatshawca@64.59.144.76>,
Mike Latondresse <mikelat@no_spamshaw.ca> wrote: > Ryan Cousineau <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote in > news:rcousine-13F959.09024310042004@morgoth.sfu.ca: > > > That thing looks really nice! Makes my similar Apollo conversion > > look like junk. > > > > Now I just have to check the gearing on mine; I think I'm using > > like a 50x14, which may explain why I find it a pain to ride. > > > > Ryan, I ride mine a lot and use a 42x16 which seems to be just about > right for the average hills around the city although it would be a bit > of a grind up SFU hill. I did some tooth counting today...The current gear is a 52x16. I'm going to try something more in your range. I even have a fresh set of 165mm cranks to install on that bike, so maybe the fixie will get a little more work this year. -- Ryan Cousineau, rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/ President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Benjamin Lewis wrote:
<< ...175mm cranks (yeah, I know they're long, but I couldn't find any shorter ones I liked and pedal strikes don't seem to be a problem -- the pedals strike at just a bit shy of 45 degrees lean.) ...>> I would stick with the 175s unless you have real short legs and would use shorter cranks anyway. Robert |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Benjamin Lewis" <bclewis@cs.sfu.ca> wrote in message news:yy7osmfc9vix.fsf@css.css.sfu.ca... > > I've been working on building up a fixed gear bicycle from scrounged parts > for a while now, and I finally got it ride-able the other day. The frame > was rusty when I found it, and the rear triangle was bent. > > Here's what it looks like now, after I finished painting the frame (old > paint and rust cleaned off with a wire brush wheel on a drill): > > http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie1a.jpg > http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie2a.jpg > > It still needs bar tape, and probably a back brake (it's got just a regular > freewheel hub with the cog and a BB lockring screwed on). The gearing > seems to be okay, if a little high for some hills; it's a 40x14 with 175mm > cranks (yeah, I know they're long, but I couldn't find any shorter ones I > liked and pedal strikes don't seem to be a problem -- the pedals strike at > just a bit shy of 45 degrees lean.) > > I've got some toe clips waiting for it, too. > > The brakes barely fit with the top of the pads shaved off -- the frame was > evidently made for 27" wheels. > Nice save! Are those rack/fender eyelets I see? You've got the makings of a nice commuter there, I say. Have fun with it... |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I went to Sheldon's site. Look at the picture- Is that bike made of wood?
.. > > Sheldon Brown, master of the workaround, has a solution you might be > interested in. > > http://www.sheldonbrown.com/home-drop.html > > |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mike Kruger wrote:
> Sheldon Brown, master of the workaround, has a solution you might be > interested in. > > http://www.sheldonbrown.com/home-drop.html Yeah, I was thinking I might do something along those lines. I remember seeing that before and thinking it looked scary, but now that I see the details it's doesn't look so bad. -- Benjamin Lewis Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only specification is that it should run noiselessly. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> Now I just have to check the gearing on mine; I think I'm using like a > 50x14, which may explain why I find it a pain to ride. Ouch. The 40x14 seems pretty good for me so far; I originally thought I might want it even lower, but it's been fine where I've ridden it so far. -- Benjamin Lewis Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only specification is that it should run noiselessly. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jacobe Hazzard wrote:
> Benjamin Lewis wrote: >> I've been working on building up a fixed gear bicycle from scrounged >> parts for a while now, and I finally got it ride-able the other day. >> The frame was rusty when I found it, and the rear triangle was bent. >> >> Here's what it looks like now, after I finished painting the frame (old >> paint and rust cleaned off with a wire brush wheel on a drill): >> >> http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie1a.jpg >> http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie2a.jpg > > That's a nice looking bike! Can you share a little about how you did the > painting? (It sounds like you did it yourself?) > I am interesting in painting some frames I have scrounged, and would be > very happy with those results. I am wondering about primers, brands of > paint, topcoats etc. First I stripped the frame, and took off all the old paint and rust with a wire wheel on a hand drill (I found it was better to brush perpendicular to the direction of the tubes). I left the fork on, and covered the headset with masking tape; I also put rolled up bits of newspaper in the various braze-ons, etc., and taped the inside of the BB shell. I hung the frame outside from a rope (through the BB shell). I used a bottle of spray paint by General Paint advertised as "Marine hi-gloss rust resistant enamel", which cost about $6 Canadian. This provided enough paint for the frame (two coats). The instructions say no primer is necessary, so I didn't use one. General Paint has a website (www.generalpaint.com), but after a cursory look I didn't see the paint I used there. They appear to be Vancouver (Canada) based. The first coat I did was a little sloppy, and I got a few drips, so I sanded these down before applying the second coat. There are a few spots that I partially missed, and since the frame was hanging upside down these ended up being more obvious than I would like. I'll probably buy a second bottle and touch it up at some point. -- Benjamin Lewis Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only specification is that it should run noiselessly. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
r15757@aol.com wrote:
> Benjamin Lewis wrote: > > << ...175mm cranks (yeah, I know they're long, but I couldn't find any > shorter ones I liked and pedal strikes don't seem to be a problem -- the > pedals strike at just a bit shy of 45 degrees lean.) ...>> > > I would stick with the 175s unless you have real short legs and would use > shorter cranks anyway. I'm about 6'2", so my legs are fairly long. I would only consider getting shorter ones if I thought pedal strikes might be a problem. They haven't been so far ... -- Benjamin Lewis Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only specification is that it should run noiselessly. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
noway@schwinn.com wrote:
> Nice save! Are those rack/fender eyelets I see? You've got the makings of > a nice commuter there, I say. Have fun with it... At the moment I think I want to keep it fairly minimalist; that's one of the things I like about it. I have the luxury of being able to bring my bike into my office where I'm working at the moment, so I commute on my touring/randonneur bike: http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/perso...vitali1crop.gif Fenders and rack have been added since this photo was taken. I also don't think I'm ready to commute to campus on a fixie yet; the very end of the ride involves something like 350 meters of elevation gain over 4 km, and that's *after* a 10 km ride involving a number of smaller hills. I'll definitely have fun with it, however. -- Benjamin Lewis Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only specification is that it should run noiselessly. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Benjamin Lewis <bclewis@cs.sfu.ca> wrote:
> http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie1a.jpg > http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie2a.jpg > It still needs bar tape, and probably a back brake (it's got just a regular > freewheel hub with the cog and a BB lockring screwed on). The gearing > seems to be okay, if a little high for some hills; it's a 40x14 with 175mm > cranks (yeah, I know they're long, but I couldn't find any shorter ones I > liked and pedal strikes don't seem to be a problem -- the pedals strike at > just a bit shy of 45 degrees lean.) > I've got some toe clips waiting for it, too. > The brakes barely fit with the top of the pads shaved off -- the frame was > evidently made for 27" wheels. It was made for cantilever brakes. Such frames/forks often have holes in the fork crown and seatstay bridge for mounting fenders. You can mount a caliper brake there, but no guarantee the brake reach will match. A "long reach" 47-57mm caliper is usually a better bet. You could also use cantilever brakes, of course. That frame looks like it has relatively little BB drop, which is why you aren't having any pedal strike even with 175mm cranks. I agree that a 42/16 gear is reasonable. Your gear is a little higher - of course, if you lower it, going _down_ hills is more of an exercise. Ryan's 52/16 is painfully high for street riding if there are any hills. |
|