![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
From the live commentary to today's stage:
"The peloton isn't in a great hurry today, and is still together after 83 km of riding. As mentioned before, this is how the Italians race in the Giro. It's very different to the Tour or the Vuelta, when the attacks start from the gun and don't stop until at least one rider "breaks the elastic" and the peloton stops chasing for a while. In the Giro, the speed tends to increase as the stage goes on, and the overall average speed is generally lower than the other two Grand Tours. Although the racing can be slow at times, this style should put less stress on the riders" |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <2gemh1F1usmgU1@uni-berlin.de>, Robert Chung
<me2@privacy.net> wrote: > From the live commentary to today's stage: > > "The peloton isn't in a great hurry today, and is still together after 83 > km of riding. As mentioned before, this is how the Italians race in the > Giro. It's very different to the Tour or the Vuelta, when the attacks > start from the gun and don't stop until at least one rider "breaks the > elastic" and the peloton stops chasing for a while. In the Giro, the speed > tends to increase as the stage goes on, and the overall average speed is > generally lower than the other two Grand Tours. > > Although the racing can be slow at times, this style should put less > stress on the riders" So you think lower average speed equates to less stress? You'll need more information about the racing besides average speed to make an accurate estimate about the amount of stress on a rider. -WG |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
warren wrote:
> In article <2gemh1F1usmgU1@uni-berlin.de>, Robert Chung > <me2@privacy.net> wrote: > >> From the live commentary to today's stage: >> >> "The peloton isn't in a great hurry today, and is still together after >> 83 km of riding. As mentioned before, this is how the Italians race in >> the Giro. It's very different to the Tour or the Vuelta, when the >> attacks start from the gun and don't stop until at least one rider >> "breaks the elastic" and the peloton stops chasing for a while. In the >> Giro, the speed tends to increase as the stage goes on, and the >> overall average speed is generally lower than the other two Grand >> Tours. >> >> Although the racing can be slow at times, this style should put less >> stress on the riders" > > So you think lower average speed equates to less stress? Nope, not me. Jeff does. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:2gffspF28u32U1@uni-berlin.de... > warren wrote: > > In article <2gemh1F1usmgU1@uni-berlin.de>, Robert Chung > > <me2@privacy.net> wrote: > > > > > > So you think lower average speed equates to less stress? > > Nope, not me. Jeff does. > ....and I didn't say lower average speed = less stress. It was more a comment on the fact that they do less "racing kilometres" in the Giro compared to the Tour/Vuelta. Analyse a typical stage and you'll see what I mean. Sometimes in the Tour they can be racing for the first 100km at 50 km/h before it settles down, and it picks up at the end, the same as the Giro does. In the Vuelta the stages are shorter, but they're still generally flat out from the gun, maybe with an interlude in the middle before getting hard again at the end. The average speed in the Tour and Vuelta is typically higher than the Giro, which is a by-product of the style of racing. I guess my basic premise is that more racing kilometres = more stress on the body. Jeff |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jeff Jones wrote:
> "Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:2gffspF28u32U1@uni-berlin.de... >> warren wrote: >>> In article <2gemh1F1usmgU1@uni-berlin.de>, Robert Chung >>> <me2@privacy.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> So you think lower average speed equates to less stress? >> >> Nope, not me. Jeff does. >> > ...and I didn't say lower average speed = less stress. > > It was more a comment on the fact that they do less "racing kilometres" > in the Giro compared to the Tour/Vuelta. Analyse a typical stage and > you'll see what I mean. Sometimes in the Tour they can be racing for > the first 100km at 50 km/h before it settles down, and it picks up at > the end, the same as the Giro does. In the Vuelta the stages are > shorter, but they're still generally flat out from the gun, maybe with > an interlude in the middle before getting hard again at the end. > > The average speed in the Tour and Vuelta is typically higher than the > Giro, which is a by-product of the style of racing. I guess my basic > premise is that more racing kilometres = more stress on the body. > > Jeff http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...t_uids=14514543 |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:2gfhsoF2aj14U1@uni-berlin.de... > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...=pubmed&dopt=Ab stract&list_uids=14514543 > OK, but I'm not sure if that's quite the same thing (it's close). Maybe I'm using the wrong definition of "stress" but I'd say that a 40 km ride done in 50 minutes is harder on the body than a 40 km ride done in 1hr20min, even though the time on the bike for the latter is considerably longer. Or taken to an extreme, doing 1 km in 1 minute will knock you around more than doing 1 km in 2 minutes. Jeff |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jeff Jones wrote:
> "Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:2gfhsoF2aj14U1@uni-berlin.de... >> >> > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...=pubmed&dopt=Ab > stract&list_uids=14514543 >> > OK, but I'm not sure if that's quite the same thing (it's close). > > Maybe I'm using the wrong definition of "stress" but I'd say that a 40 > km ride done in 50 minutes is harder on the body than a 40 km ride done > in 1hr20min, even though the time on the bike for the latter is > considerably longer. Well, in general I'd agree, but is a 40km ride done in 50 minutes harder than a 1hr20min ride where you cover 22km in the first hour and 18km in the last 20? I don't know, and that's why I was wondering whether the piano beginnings of Giro stages really compensated for the fortissimo endings. BTW, here's a related study, same authors, for only the Tour and Vuelta: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...t_uids=12750600 |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:2ggleuF2dhp5U1@uni-berlin.de... > > Well, in general I'd agree, but is a 40km ride done in 50 minutes harder > than a 1hr20min ride where you cover 22km in the first hour and 18km in > the last 20? I don't know, and that's why I was wondering whether the > piano beginnings of Giro stages really compensated for the fortissimo > endings. > To me, a Giro stage goes like: piano - crescendo - fortissmo, whereas a Tour stage starts fortissimo (or forte) with a lot of sforzandos, has a short piano interlude in the middle, then crescendos to fortissimo punctuated by the odd sforzando at the end. I don't know whether they go faster at the end of a Giro stage than a Tour stage, but to me it seems to be similar. The main difference is the piano beginning at the Giro. > BTW, here's a related study, same authors, for only the Tour and Vuelta: > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...=pubmed&dopt=Ab stract&list_uids=12750600 > Interesting as well. Has anyone compared the Giro and the Tour like this? I guess the previous study did, although it was only n = 1. And is using only three ventilatory thresholds a good measure of workload on the body? Jeff |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jeff Jones wrote:
>> <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...&db=pubmed&dopt =Abstract&list_uids=12750600> >> > Interesting as well. Has anyone compared the Giro and the Tour like > this? I guess the previous study did, although it was only n = 1. And > is using only three ventilatory thresholds a good measure of workload > on the body? I don't know of anyone else who has, mostly 'cuz the data would be hard to come by. These guys had access to HRM data. One of the things you'll notice is that the data were supplied by Spanish teams, and the Spanish don't send many teams to the Giro. There must be data hiding in the Mapei vaults somewhere that one could use to compare the Giro and the Tour. Use your cyclingnews.com leverage to get Squinzi to open up. One of the coauthors of these two studies told me they were trying to get a couple of riders to use SRMs on the Tour and the Vuelta, but the riders balked. I wondered myself about the three interval weighting scheme and my rough estimate was that if one used a more finely graduated (or continuous) scale the Vuelta was no less "stressful" than the Tour (using HR load; Coggan has developed a stress scale based on power but, alas, we don't have power data). I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its use in the live commentary. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:2gh2d5F2oda3U1@uni-berlin.de... > Jeff Jones wrote: > >> > <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...&db=pubmed&dopt > =Abstract&list_uids=12750600> > >> [Snippitysnap] > > I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its use > in the live commentary. > Ditto. sfor·zan·do (sfôrt-sän"d½) also for·zan·do (fôrt-sän"d½) --adv. --adj. Abbr. sf., sfz. Music. 1. Suddenly and strongly accented. Used chiefly as a direction. --n., pl. sfor·zan·dos or sfor·zan·di (-d¶). A sforzando tone or chord. [Italian, gerund of sforzare, to use force : s-, intensive pref. (from Latin ex-; see EX-) + forzare, to force (from Vulgar Latin *forti³re, from Latin fortis, strong; see FORTIS).] --sfor·zan"do adv. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:2gh2d5F2oda3U1@uni-berlin.de... > I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its use > in the live commentary. > Just going with the music dynamics analogy. Sforzando = attack! |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <2gh2d5F2oda3U1@uni-berlin.de>, Robert Chung
<me2@privacy.net> wrote: > Jeff Jones wrote: > >> > <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...&db=pubmed&dopt > =Abstract&list_uids=12750600> > >> > > Interesting as well. Has anyone compared the Giro and the Tour like > > this? I guess the previous study did, although it was only n = 1. And > > is using only three ventilatory thresholds a good measure of workload > > on the body? > > I don't know of anyone else who has, mostly 'cuz the data would be hard to > come by. These guys had access to HRM data. One of the things you'll > notice is that the data were supplied by Spanish teams, and the Spanish > don't send many teams to the Giro. There must be data hiding in the Mapei > vaults somewhere that one could use to compare the Giro and the Tour. Use > your cyclingnews.com leverage to get Squinzi to open up. Squinzi? How about one of the coaches? I made a comment to one that I thought the Tour was harder than the Giro but he said the Giro was physically harder than the Tour, in large part because the clmbs tend to be harder, mostly because they tend to be steeper. Even though it's mostly Italian teams in the Giro they race very hard (overall) because they care so much about it. The Italians don't care nearly as much about racing well in the Tour and most other countries don't care as much about the Giro as they do the Tour. -WG |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:<2gh2d5F2oda3U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> Jeff Jones wrote: > >> > <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...&db=pubmed&dopt > =Abstract&list_uids=12750600> > >> > > Interesting as well. Has anyone compared the Giro and the Tour like > > this? I guess the previous study did, although it was only n = 1. And > > is using only three ventilatory thresholds a good measure of workload > > on the body? > > I don't know of anyone else who has, mostly 'cuz the data would be hard to > come by. These guys had access to HRM data. One of the things you'll > notice is that the data were supplied by Spanish teams, and the Spanish > don't send many teams to the Giro. There must be data hiding in the Mapei > vaults somewhere that one could use to compare the Giro and the Tour. Use > your cyclingnews.com leverage to get Squinzi to open up. One of the > coauthors of these two studies told me they were trying to get a couple of > riders to use SRMs on the Tour and the Vuelta, but the riders balked. I > wondered myself about the three interval weighting scheme and my rough > estimate was that if one used a more finely graduated (or continuous) > scale the Vuelta was no less "stressful" than the Tour (using HR load; > Coggan has developed a stress scale based on power but, alas, we don't > have power data). > > I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its use > in the live commentary. I'm disagree somewhat, because terms like "fortissimo," "piano," "crescendo," etc. refer to volume, not speed. (A sforzando is like an exclamation point on a single note or chord.) There are perfectly acceptable Italian terms in music which DO refer to speed and which could be applied in commentary - 'adagio' or 'lento' for slow, 'andante' for a casual but not draggy speed, 'vivace' or 'presto' for fast, and 'accelerando,' 'stretto' or my favorite, 'stringendo,' for the final mad sprint to the line. -Sonarrat. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Sonarrat" <sonarrat@stormloader.com> wrote in message news:21429691.0405131005.73dbb96c@posting.google.com... > "Robert Chung" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message news:<2gh2d5F2oda3U1@uni-berlin.de>... > > > > I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its use > > in the live commentary. > > I'm disagree somewhat, because terms like "fortissimo," "piano," > "crescendo," etc. refer to volume, not speed. (A sforzando is like an > exclamation point on a single note or chord.) > I know they refer to volume and not speed, but I didn't think up the "piano" analogy in the first place. Robert and I merely extended it - probably beyond its capacity. Of course it would make more sense to use a speed analogy, but that's the beauty of the subtle differences in language. Jeff (thinks Crescenzo d'Amore is a pretty cool name for an Italian, but that's another thread) |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jeff Jones wrote: > To me, a Giro stage goes like: piano - crescendo - fortissmo, whereas a Tour > stage starts fortissimo (or forte) with a lot of sforzandos, has a short > piano interlude in the middle, then crescendos to fortissimo punctuated by > the odd sforzando at the end. I don't know whether they go faster at the end > of a Giro stage than a Tour stage, but to me it seems to be similar. The > main difference is the piano beginning at the Giro. I hadn't realized that this was the meaning of the word "score" that you were using in the subject line... |
|