![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>
> Most people get on with a standard Flite. They look good on any bike too. not if you have a big ass. a flite is too small for someone that weighs 180. Pro link is more like it. |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"basjan" <basjan@vt.edu> wrote in message news:c5pcjq$r6u$1@solaris.cc.vt.edu... > > "Gunny Bunny" <none@none.com> wrote in message > news:7TEfc.24246$2Z6.1004411@news20.bellglobal.com... > > Hello, > > > > I have a Bianchi Road Bike with a Gel Velo saddle, I have had it for > several > > years and thought I would upgrade it to something more contemporary and > > higher quality. > > > > The problem I have is there are so many saddles and opinions, I have > > absolutely no idea which one to buy !! > > I absolutely love my Selle Italia Max Flite Transam. Not overly heavy, but > a slightly wider back-part for comfort and a nice cut-out to prevent a limp > biscuit... > > Basjan Hi, do you find the hole works or is it just a gimmick ?? I notice San Marco has one too, but in Titatium !! |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:33:06 -0400, "Gunny Bunny" <none@none.com> may
have said: >Hello, > >I have a Bianchi Road Bike with a Gel Velo saddle, I have had it for several >years and thought I would upgrade it to something more contemporary and >higher quality. > >The problem I have is there are so many saddles and opinions, I have >absolutely no idea which one to buy !! Realistically, neither do most of the rest of us. >I weigh 180 lbs and 6 ft tall. I ride 80 kms on Sundays both flats and >medium sized hills. > >Any suggestions of where I should start my search would be appreciated ! While it might seem logical to think that saddles from the same maker that produced the one you're riding now would be a good jumping-on point, even that's not a guarantee of a match. Saddle shape and size is such an individually-peculiar thing that literally the only way to find a saddle that works well is to jump on and try it. Even then, a saddle that was perfect with the seat post up high might be a literal pain in the rear with the post dropped for a different riding style. >Oh, there are many many bike shops in my area, so I have some access to >various makers ![]() The ones that are honest and competent will understand the complexity of this issue, and may be able to let to test-ride a bike that's equipped with the saddle you're contemplating, but that's not likely to be the case in all instances. Even the most accommodating lbs will have a real challenge trying to have a demo available for any significant fraction of the saddles they sell. One last thought; if the one you're riding now isn't beat to death, and is still comfortable, why not just stick with it? If it's not broke, as they say, don't fix it. -- My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail. Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In rec.bicycles.tech Callistus Valerius <jazzyboss@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Most people get on with a standard Flite. They look good on any bike too. > not if you have a big ass. a flite is too small for someone that weighs > 180. Pro link is more like it. I don't think it's about the riders weight, but the shape of the butt. Personally, weighing about 135 lbs, I've tried Flite, Flite TT and SLR XP. Of those three I could never get very comfortable on the SLR XP. The problem wasn't the padding (or lack of it) but the wide shape of the saddle, which for me caused chafing. I know of several significantly bigger guys who seem to like the SLR a lot. -as |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Contemporary and higher quality"?
You would be surprised how many professional racers use the highest quality Brooks leather saddles. A product that has been around, almost unchanged, for about a century! If it fits, is comfortable and isn't falling apart, use it. - - "May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear for the hills!" Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman" Chris'Z Corner http://www.geocities.com/czcorner |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Callistus Valerius wrote:
>>Most people get on with a standard Flite. They look good on any bike too. > > > not if you have a big ass. a flite is too small for someone that weighs > 180. Pro link is more like it. What does chain lubricant have to do with this? <http://www.progoldmfr.com/products/prolink.html>. -- Tom Sherman – Quad Cities (Illinois Side) |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Chris Zacho "The Wheelman"" <ChriszCorner@webtv.net> a écrit dans le
message de : news:29688-4080887C-83@storefull-3174.bay.webtv.net... > "Contemporary and higher quality"? > > You would be surprised how many professional racers use the highest > quality Brooks leather saddles. A product that has been around, almost > unchanged, for about a century! Go ahead - surprise me and name a few of them... -- Bonne route, Sandy Paris FR |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<< the
Turbomatic 4 is incredibly comfortable (apparently Ullrich agrees), and I strongly recommend that one to anyone without reservation. Unfortunately, the Turbo 4 does not seem to be sold in the U.S. >> ExcelSports sells them. I've been riding the original Turbomatic with the ti rails since they came out in around 1990. You can find these on ebay occasionally. This saddle has a smooth leather top in black or white leather, and they weigh around 260g, which is pretty light for a suspension saddle. The rubber pads do help soften sharp bumps. The shape of the Turbomatic is a couple mm's wider than the Flite at the back. I've ridden the Turbomatic 2 and 3 with the steel rails, and they didn't feel the same. They were stiffer and more rigid. I don't know if it's the ti rails, but to me the ti version is a more compliant saddle. i never tried the Turbomatic 4. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
John Retchford wrote:
> In my experience, bottoms do not take much notice of "contemporary" and > "higher quality" when it comes to saddles. Mine demands a certain shape > and a certain amount of padding to be comfortable. It refuses to be > impressed by the saddle maker's name or the price tag. [...] > Funnily enough, after some painful experiences on early 400 and 600 > km brevet rides when I developed haematomas under the ischial bones > while riding expensive saddles, I tried a Velo and was delighted. I > can now ride those distances comfortably - well, on the bottom > anyway. The fact that my current Velo (marked "Velo Plush") cost only > $10 was just a bonus. Just to prove John's point regarding one size not fitting all, I have a saddle mared "Velo Plush" that I really dislike. 3 or 4 hours on that saddle is uncomfortable, although not to the point of giving me sores or any long term problems. That saddle is still in use, but on a bike that doesn't typically get ridden for more than an hour at a crack. -- Dave dvt at psu dot edu |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
dvt wrote:
> Just to prove John's point regarding one size not fitting all, I have > a saddle mared "Velo Plush" that I really dislike. 3 or 4 hours on > that saddle is uncomfortable, although not to the point of giving me > sores or any long term problems. That saddle is still in use, but on > a bike that doesn't typically get ridden for more than an hour at a > crack. So to speak. Bill "garage full of saddles" S. |
|