Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > aus.bicycle > aus.bicycle archive
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29-06.-2004, 05:41 AM   #16
kingsley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 03:30:01 +0000, hippy wrote:

> From RACV's RoyalAuto magazine:
>
> "Traffic in central London averages 4.6km/h, according to a study.
> Roadworks and traffic calming schemes have reduced speeds to as low as
> 2.5km/h on some routes"


Yeah, but it's probably like Sydney:

Sit at lights for 1 minute, drive 90km/h over 10 seconds
to the next set... still gives you a low average speed, but
don't make it safe.

I think alot of people see 'traffic calming' devices as
some sort of auto-obsticle-course to be taken as fast
as possible.

The only reall traffic calmer has a blue light on top.

-kt

 
Old 29-06.-2004, 10:11 PM   #17
David Damerell
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

Andrew Webster <awebster@littleheath.org.uk> wrote:
>David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>Bear in mind that you may use the surface Tube lines outside the rush hour
>>with an unfolded bike; most of the major railway terminuses are on or
>>within walking distance of the Circle Line.

>A bit of a contradiction in terms here. The shallow underground lines
>are not "tube", but of cut-and-cover construction.


I know that (although I realise other rbt readers may not); indeed,
outside central London (as you know) the surface lines are above the
surface in many places.

_But_ it's all the big-T Tube even where it's not a small-t tube; just as
it is the big-U Underground even when it is not little-u underground.
--
David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> flcl?
 
Old 01-07.-2004, 06:00 AM   #18
Andrew Webster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote in message news:<+PA*BQfoq@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>...
> Andrew Webster <awebster@littleheath.org.uk> wrote:
> >David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> >>Bear in mind that you may use the surface Tube lines outside the rush hour
> >>with an unfolded bike; most of the major railway terminuses are on or
> >>within walking distance of the Circle Line.

> >A bit of a contradiction in terms here. The shallow underground lines
> >are not "tube", but of cut-and-cover construction.

>
> I know that (although I realise other rbt readers may not); indeed,
> outside central London (as you know) the surface lines are above the
> surface in many places.
>
> _But_ it's all the big-T Tube even where it's not a small-t tube; just as
> it is the big-U Underground even when it is not little-u underground.


You are right, the capitalisation makes all the difference!

Andrew Webster
 
Old 01-07.-2004, 06:03 AM   #19
Andrew Webster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote in message news:<+PA*BQfoq@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>...
> Andrew Webster <awebster@littleheath.org.uk> wrote:
> >David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> >>Bear in mind that you may use the surface Tube lines outside the rush hour
> >>with an unfolded bike; most of the major railway terminuses are on or
> >>within walking distance of the Circle Line.

> >A bit of a contradiction in terms here. The shallow underground lines
> >are not "tube", but of cut-and-cover construction.

>
> I know that (although I realise other rbt readers may not); indeed,
> outside central London (as you know) the surface lines are above the
> surface in many places.
>
> _But_ it's all the big-T Tube even where it's not a small-t tube; just as
> it is the big-U Underground even when it is not little-u underground.


I'll quote from http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/lu-summary.htm just
to support my argument...

The name "tube" appeared early in the 20th century when the deep level
lines first opened with their small diameter tunnels. It is now often
used (incorrectly) by the general public to mean any Underground line.
"I'll take the Tube" is an expression commonly heard in London. The
sub surface lines are the Circle, District, East London, Hammersmith &
City and Metropolitan Lines. Only the others, the Bakerloo, Central,
Jubilee, Northern, Piccadilly, Victoria and Waterloo & City Lines are
true tube lines.


....but clearly you are right here, the capitalisation makes all the
difference!

Andrew Webster
 
Old 01-07.-2004, 03:10 PM   #20
Tumbleweed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?


"Andrew Webster" <awebster@littleheath.org.uk> wrote in message
news:6f3aac0b.0406301303.1da04daa@posting.google.com...
> David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote in message

news:<+PA*BQfoq@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>...
> > Andrew Webster <awebster@littleheath.org.uk> wrote:
> > >David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> > >>Bear in mind that you may use the surface Tube lines outside the rush

hour
> > >>with an unfolded bike; most of the major railway terminuses are on or
> > >>within walking distance of the Circle Line.
> > >A bit of a contradiction in terms here. The shallow underground lines
> > >are not "tube", but of cut-and-cover construction.

> >
> > I know that (although I realise other rbt readers may not); indeed,
> > outside central London (as you know) the surface lines are above the
> > surface in many places.
> >
> > _But_ it's all the big-T Tube even where it's not a small-t tube; just

as
> > it is the big-U Underground even when it is not little-u underground.

>
> I'll quote from http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/lu-summary.htm just
> to support my argument...
>
> The name "tube" appeared early in the 20th century when the deep level
> lines first opened with their small diameter tunnels. It is now often
> used (incorrectly) by the general public to mean any Underground line.


Common useage defines what is 'incorrect'. In this case, you are :-)

--
Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com


 
Old 01-07.-2004, 05:58 PM   #21
Peter File
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

> The name "tube" appeared early in the 20th century when the deep level
> lines first opened with their small diameter tunnels. It is now often
> used (incorrectly) by the general public to mean any Underground line.
> "I'll take the Tube" is an expression commonly heard in London. The
> sub surface lines are the Circle, District, East London, Hammersmith &
> City and Metropolitan Lines. Only the others, the Bakerloo, Central,
> Jubilee, Northern, Piccadilly, Victoria and Waterloo & City Lines are
> true tube lines.


Right I'll remember that on my next trip from Harrow on the Hill to
Waterloo.
'Im taking the surface/cut'n'cover to Baker St and then the tube to
Waterloo'


 
Old 01-07.-2004, 06:28 PM   #22
Roger Hughes
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:58:43 +0100, "Peter File"
<ted_maul_is_god@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>> The name "tube" appeared early in the 20th century when the deep level
>> lines first opened with their small diameter tunnels. It is now often
>> used (incorrectly) by the general public to mean any Underground line.
>> "I'll take the Tube" is an expression commonly heard in London. The
>> sub surface lines are the Circle, District, East London, Hammersmith &
>> City and Metropolitan Lines. Only the others, the Bakerloo, Central,
>> Jubilee, Northern, Piccadilly, Victoria and Waterloo & City Lines are
>> true tube lines.

>
>Right I'll remember that on my next trip from Harrow on the Hill to
>Waterloo.
>'Im taking the surface/cut'n'cover to Baker St and then the tube to
>Waterloo'
>


Naah, you want to change to the Fleet Line at Finchley Road.

 
Old 01-07.-2004, 07:24 PM   #23
Colin Blackburn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:28:57 +0100, Roger Hughes
<roger@hughes-USUALANTISPAMSTUFF-translations.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:58:43 +0100, "Peter File"
> <ted_maul_is_god@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> Right I'll remember that on my next trip from Harrow on the Hill to
>> Waterloo.
>> 'Im taking the surface/cut'n'cover to Baker St and then the tube to
>> Waterloo'
>>

>
> Naah, you want to change to the Fleet Line at Finchley Road.


Green Park.

Colin

 
Old 01-07.-2004, 07:31 PM   #24
Just zis Guy, you know?
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:24:48 +0100, "Colin Blackburn"
<colin.blackburn@durham.ac.uk> wrote in message
<opsage7mm9yxrafp@nntphost.dur.ac.uk>:

>Finchley Road.
>Green Park.


Ealing Broadway, and Colin, you're in Spoon so the double reverse is
blocked.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University
 
Old 01-07.-2004, 07:40 PM   #25
David Martin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

On 1/7/04 11:31 am, in article ttp7e0dnp8fq9o7raptb8ovleflaejpo3n@4ax.com,
"Just zis Guy, you know?" <outlook.bugs@microsoft.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:24:48 +0100, "Colin Blackburn"
> <colin.blackburn@durham.ac.uk> wrote in message
> <opsage7mm9yxrafp@nntphost.dur.ac.uk>:


>> Finchley Road.
>> Green Park.


> Ealing Broadway, and Colin, you're in Spoon so the double reverse is
> blocked.


If I used Sheldon's shuffle I could go via Euston and then claim Mornington
Crescent? I suppose it depends whether you are doing the city line as top
tube, seat tube or down tube..

...d

 
Old 01-07.-2004, 08:25 PM   #26
Dave Larrington
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:

> Ealing Broadway, and Colin, you're in Spoon so the double reverse is
> blocked.


Agh! Quick, use Spoonguard!!

--

Dave Larrington - http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/
===========================================================
Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
http://www.bhpc.org.uk/
===========================================================


 
Old 01-07.-2004, 09:41 PM   #27
Miguel Cruz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

Just zis Guy, you know? <guy.chapman+usenet-reply@spamcop.net> wrote:
> "Colin Blackburn" <colin.blackburn@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Finchley Road.
>> Green Park.

>
> Ealing Broadway, and Colin, you're in Spoon so the double reverse is
> blocked.


Nice try. There's no Spoon until someone's passed through Tooting Bec.

miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu
 
Old 01-07.-2004, 11:40 PM   #28
James Silverton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?


"Peter File" <ted_maul_is_god@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2ki223F2klejU1@uni-berlin.de...
> > The name "tube" appeared early in the 20th century when the deep

level
> > lines first opened with their small diameter tunnels. It is now

often
> > used (incorrectly) by the general public to mean any Underground

line.
> > "I'll take the Tube" is an expression commonly heard in London.

The
> > sub surface lines are the Circle, District, East London,

Hammersmith &
> > City and Metropolitan Lines. Only the others, the Bakerloo,

Central,
> > Jubilee, Northern, Piccadilly, Victoria and Waterloo & City Lines

are
> > true tube lines.

>
> Right I'll remember that on my next trip from Harrow on the Hill to
> Waterloo.
> 'Im taking the surface/cut'n'cover to Baker St and then the tube to
> Waterloo'
>
>


This brings back memories! On my first visit to London, as a boy of 11
more years ago than I am going to admit, I asked a very proper City
type with umbrella and Derby (Bowler?) where was the nearest Tube
Station. He assumed a puzzled expression in then said in a superior
fashion, "Oh, you mean the Underground Station!"


--
James V. Silverton
Potomac, Maryland, USA


 
Old 02-07.-2004, 04:19 AM   #29
Whingin' Pom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:41:53 GMT, Miguel Cruz <spam@un.u.nu> ()
wrote:

>Just zis Guy, you know? <guy.chapman+usenet-reply@spamcop.net> wrote:
>> "Colin Blackburn" <colin.blackburn@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> Finchley Road.
>>> Green Park.

>>
>> Ealing Broadway, and Colin, you're in Spoon so the double reverse is
>> blocked.

>
>Nice try. There's no Spoon until someone's passed through Tooting Bec.


Dollis Hill.


--
Matt K
Waikikamukau,NZ
 
Old 02-07.-2004, 04:27 AM   #30
David Martin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Issues with folding bicycles on European trains?

On 1/7/04 8:19 pm, in article 3ro8e05kpr9irmf8tnm2l5nvpclqdbgkin@4ax.com,
"Whingin' Pom" <whinginpom@donotreply.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:41:53 GMT, Miguel Cruz <spam@un.u.nu> ()
> wrote:


>> Just zis Guy, you know? <guy.chapman+usenet-reply@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>> "Colin Blackburn" <colin.blackburn@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> Finchley Road.
>>>> Green Park.


>>> Ealing Broadway, and Colin, you're in Spoon so the double reverse is
>>> blocked.


>> Nice try. There's no Spoon until someone's passed through Tooting Bec.


> Dollis Hill.


East Cheam.

...d

 
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet