Drug scandal rocks Australian cycling

Graeme

"DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in
news:cbrr95$3gj$1@lust.ihug.co.nz:

> "Graeme" <graeme@gpdods.removethis.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9517D5290BE06graemegpdodsremoveth@203.2.194.51
>> No, but you are ignorant of when to just drop it. You're flogging a
>> dead horse.
>
> I'll believe that when I start seeing people telling off the
> troublemakers instead of me.

troublemaker - n : someone who deliberately stirs up trouble

Yes, it takes two sides to have an argument, but your posting of replies
qualifies you as a troublemaker too, unless you're posting accidentaly of
course :-)

Graeme

DRS

"Graeme" <graeme@gpdods.removethis.com> wrote in message
news:Xns951824DAF36Fgraemegpdodsremoveth@203.2.194.51
> "DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in
> news:cbrr95$3gj$1@lust.ihug.co.nz:
>> "Graeme" <graeme@gpdods.removethis.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9517D5290BE06graemegpdodsremoveth@203.2.194.51
>>> No, but you are ignorant of when to just drop it. You're flogging a
>>> dead horse.
>>
>> I'll believe that when I start seeing people telling off the
>> troublemakers instead of me.
>
> troublemaker - n : someone who deliberately stirs up trouble
>
> Yes, it takes two sides to have an argument, but your posting of
> replies qualifies you as a troublemaker too,

No, it doesn't. I'm not deliberately stirring up trouble. I'm responding
to the troublemakers. It's not at all the same thing. In fact it's not
even close. So spare me this tedious waste of energy. Expend it on the
ones who need it. When they stop imposing their selfishness and laziness on
the rest of us there will be nothing to respond to.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

mfhor

>>> No, but you are ignorant of when to just drop it. You're flogging a
>>> dead horse.
>>
>> I'll believe that when I start seeing people telling off the
>> troublemakers instead of me.
>
> troublemaker - n : someone who deliberately stirs up trouble
>
> Yes, it takes two sides to have an argument, but your posting of
> replies qualifies you as a troublemaker too,

No, it doesn't. I'm not deliberately stirring up trouble. I'm responding
to the troublemakers. It's not at all the same thing. In fact it's not
even close. So spare me this tedious waste of energy. Expend it on the
ones who need it. When they stop imposing their selfishness and laziness
on the rest of us there will be nothing to respond to.

--

A: Top-posters.
B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?


NYaa nyaa nyaa nyaa nyaa I am so better than you you beeen baad. Have
not have too have not have too Have not have too have not have tooHave
not have too have not have tooHave not have too have not have tooHave
not have too have not have tooHave not have too have not have tooHave
not have too have not have tooHave not have too have not have tooHave
not have too have not have too

What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? Pedantic people who use a
public forum to gring their tiny little axes about etiquette.

As I tell the grade 1's that I teach: Turn away from and ignore people
who are trying to annoy you. Find something else INTERESTING to do that
will take your mind off it.

Oh, that and hedgehogs.

BTW - did you know eGH is totally useless in promoting muscle growth in
humans? Is it all just a plant and an attempted stitch up?

MH



--

Lotte

How about you all give up on this thread and ride your flaming bikes!



--

Graeme

mfhor <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in news:iQnEc.24040$S33.2514
@fe44.usenetserver.com:

> Oh, that and hedgehogs.
>

What? Turn away and ignore hedgehogs too? You've no heart.

:-)

Graeme

flyingdutch

Graeme wrote:
> mfhor <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in
> news:iQnEc.24040$S33.2514news:iQnEc.24040$S33.2514
> @fe44.usenetserver.com:
> > Oh, that and hedgehogs.
> >
> What? Turn away and ignore hedgehogs too? You've no heart.
> :-)
> Graeme



We have hedgehogs in Oz???

or are you talkin biscuits



--

mfhor

Graeme wrote:
> mfhor <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in
> news:iQnEc.24040$S33.2514news:iQnEc.24040$S33.2514
> @fe44.usenetserver.com:
> > Oh, that and hedgehogs.
> >
> What? Turn away and ignore hedgehogs too? You've no heart.
> :-)
> Graeme



NOOOOO! Don't ignore the hedgehogs! I was just saying how they were the
most annoying thing on Usenet, snuffling around the edges of the screen,
eating stray URLs, messing up your Javascript and spreading it all over
the . . . hang on, that's just my animated screensaver, isn't it?



MH



--

Graeme

flyingdutch <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in news:ePpEc.51019
$8h3.48530@fe16.usenetserver.com:

> We have hedgehogs in Oz???
>

All the more reason not to turn away and ignore it if you see one. The poor
wee soul is obviously lost.



Graeme

Graeme

mfhor <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in news:11qEc.9846$Jz6.3981
@fe33.usenetserver.com:

> hang on, that's just my animated screensaver, isn't it?
>

Cool, a hedgehog screensaver! Where did you get that?

L'acrobat

How sad do you have to be to think that anybody care about your sad
obsession with usenet ettiquete.

"DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
news:cbrnft$1bg$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
> "flyingdutch" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in message
> news:HN7Ec.29311$8h3.9317@fe16.usenetserver.com
> > Graeme wrote:
> > > h And if that doesn't work, how about we form a lynch mob?
> >
> > How about a new thread voting who agrees/disagrees so these 2 can ge
> > tthe message loud and clear and stop being conveniently ignorant...
>
> I'm not in the least ignorant about Usenet standards and etiquette, unlike
> that drop-kick.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

L'acrobat

So the rest of the world should care about your pathetic obsession now?


"DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
news:cbrr95$3gj$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
> "Graeme" <graeme@gpdods.removethis.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9517D5290BE06graemegpdodsremoveth@203.2.194.51
> > "DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in news:cbrnft$1bg$1
> > @lust.ihug.co.nz:
> >
> >> I'm not in the least ignorant about Usenet standards
> >
> > No, but you are ignorant of when to just drop it. You're flogging a
> > dead horse.
>
> I'll believe that when I start seeing people telling off the troublemakers
> instead of me.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

L'acrobat

You are constantly whining about top posting, that = troublemaking.


"DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
news:cbs5ru$8d0$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
> "Graeme" <graeme@gpdods.removethis.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns951824DAF36Fgraemegpdodsremoveth@203.2.194.51
> > "DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in
> > news:cbrr95$3gj$1@lust.ihug.co.nz:
> >> "Graeme" <graeme@gpdods.removethis.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns9517D5290BE06graemegpdodsremoveth@203.2.194.51
> >>> No, but you are ignorant of when to just drop it. You're flogging a
> >>> dead horse.
> >>
> >> I'll believe that when I start seeing people telling off the
> >> troublemakers instead of me.
> >
> > troublemaker - n : someone who deliberately stirs up trouble
> >
> > Yes, it takes two sides to have an argument, but your posting of
> > replies qualifies you as a troublemaker too,
>
> No, it doesn't. I'm not deliberately stirring up trouble. I'm responding
> to the troublemakers. It's not at all the same thing. In fact it's not
> even close. So spare me this tedious waste of energy. Expend it on the
> ones who need it. When they stop imposing their selfishness and laziness
on
> the rest of us there will be nothing to respond to.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

L'acrobat

yawn


"Richard Sherratt" <richard.sherratt@NOTHINGHEREbrunsley.com.au> wrote in
message news:6p72e0tg5fsdit0pserflv9mduqe231j33@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:28:42 GMT, "L'acrobat"
> <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> >Your sig is a classic example of whining, and the funny part is that it
is
> >actually counterproductive.
> >
> >Oh yes, your crusade is going swimmingly, you have actually convinced
> >someone to take up top posting.
> >
> >So, Top Posting - 1 v DRS - 0
> >
> >What a sad loser you are.
>
> Oh dear. We've attracted a fool.
>
> This is a nice, friendly newsgroup where occasional lapses in Usenet
> protocols are not jumped on and where learners are gently advised of
> the correct way to do things. Of course, if they continue to ignore
> the advice and get all precious about their rights to annoy other
> people, they will be plonked.
>
>
> --
> Regards.
> Richard.

kingsley

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:38:44 +1000, DaveB wrote:

> Doh! stupid hotmail !@#$%^. Send the emails to cgara1@hotmail.com .

You kidding - you've posted a hotmail address to usenet,
it'll be chock-full of lurvely spam in a half-hour.

-kt