Drug scandal rocks Australian cycling

DRS

"L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:e2VDc.69051$sj4.21267@news-server.bigpond.net.au

[...]

> Your sig is a classic example of whining, and the funny part is that
> it is actually counterproductive.

Only a fuckwit could think it whiny. It's actually a very clever use of
irony, not that you'd be capable of understanding that. It works fine for
most people, only fuckwits see it as some sort of challenge for them to show
the world how mindbogglingly stupid and inconsiderate they can be.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

L'acrobat

Of course there isn't any reason to evolve, you like it the way it is.

But it can get better and it will, you pathetic loser.


"DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
news:cbp6vd$602$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
> "L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:R%UDc.69040$sj4.63107@news-server.bigpond.net.au
> > "DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
> > news:cbp5cj$4r4$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
> >> "kingsley" <kingsley@maddogsbreakfast.com.au> wrote in message
> >> newsan.2004.06.25.08.08.05.873666@maddogsbreakfast.com.au
> >>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:15:04 +0000, flyingdutch wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> ( altho Im just a tad curious to know what " -- " is...)
> >>>
> >>> The usenet convention is to have a single line containing '--'
> >>
> >> It's "-- ". The trailing space matters. It's not necessarily the
> >> smartest decision anyone ever made but it's part of Usenet now and
> >> isn't going to change.
> >>
> > Because its not like the internet is an evolving medium or anything
> > is it?
>
> There is no reason for it to evolve, fuckwit. It's ugly but it works.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

L'acrobat

Yes, we've been through this before - if you have to tell people it's
clever, it isn't.

It's whiny, which is why it suits you to a tee.

You are simply pathetic.


"DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
news:cbp738$616$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
> "L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:e2VDc.69051$sj4.21267@news-server.bigpond.net.au
>
> [...]
>
> > Your sig is a classic example of whining, and the funny part is that
> > it is actually counterproductive.
>
> Only a fuckwit could think it whiny. It's actually a very clever use of
> irony, not that you'd be capable of understanding that. It works fine for
> most people, only fuckwits see it as some sort of challenge for them to
show
> the world how mindbogglingly stupid and inconsiderate they can be.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

DRS

"L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote in message
newsSXDc.69232$sj4.54559@news-server.bigpond.net.au
> "DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
> news:cbp6vd$602$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
>> "L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote in message
>> news:R%UDc.69040$sj4.63107@news-server.bigpond.net.au
>>> "DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:cbp5cj$4r4$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...

[...]

>>>> It's "-- ". The trailing space matters. It's not necessarily the
>>>> smartest decision anyone ever made but it's part of Usenet now and
>>>> isn't going to change.
>>>>
>>> Because its not like the internet is an evolving medium or anything
>>> is it?
>>
>> There is no reason for it to evolve, fuckwit. It's ugly but it
>> works.
>>
> Of course there isn't any reason to evolve, you like it the way it is.

As usual you have no idea what you're talking about, fuckwit. The Internet
will evolve but the Usenet signature delimiter won't.

Your stupidity grows by leaps and bounds.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

L'acrobat

Of course it won't evolve, the net itself isn't changing at all is it you
pillock...



"DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
news:cbpigq$c65$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
> "L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote in message
> newsSXDc.69232$sj4.54559@news-server.bigpond.net.au
> > "DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
> > news:cbp6vd$602$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
> >> "L'acrobat" <husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote in message
> >> news:R%UDc.69040$sj4.63107@news-server.bigpond.net.au
> >>> "DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in message
> >>> news:cbp5cj$4r4$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
>
> [...]
>
> >>>> It's "-- ". The trailing space matters. It's not necessarily the
> >>>> smartest decision anyone ever made but it's part of Usenet now and
> >>>> isn't going to change.
> >>>>
> >>> Because its not like the internet is an evolving medium or anything
> >>> is it?
> >>
> >> There is no reason for it to evolve, fuckwit. It's ugly but it
> >> works.
> >>
> > Of course there isn't any reason to evolve, you like it the way it is.
>
> As usual you have no idea what you're talking about, fuckwit. The
Internet
> will evolve but the Usenet signature delimiter won't.
>
> Your stupidity grows by leaps and bounds.
>
> --
>
> A: Top-posters.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
>
>

hippy

>Originally posted by L'Acrobat Of course it won't evolve, the net
>itself isn't changing at all is it you pillock...

So, yeah, how about that aussie drug scandal, eh?

;-)

hippy
- very bored with this, can we just organise a punch up and be done
with it? :P



--

Graeme

hippy <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in news:hE1Ec.35937$zS.33610
@fe17.usenetserver.com:

> very bored with this, can we just organise a punch up and be done
> with it? :P
>

And if that doesn't work, how about we form a lynch mob?

Graeme

flyingdutch

Graeme wrote:
> h And if that doesn't work, how about we form a lynch mob?
> Graeme



How about a new thread voting who agrees/disagrees so these 2 can ge
tthe message loud and clear and stop being conveniently ignorant...



--

Richard Sherratt

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:28:42 GMT, "L'acrobat"
<husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote:

>Your sig is a classic example of whining, and the funny part is that it is
>actually counterproductive.
>
>Oh yes, your crusade is going swimmingly, you have actually convinced
>someone to take up top posting.
>
>So, Top Posting - 1 v DRS - 0
>
>What a sad loser you are.

Oh dear. We've attracted a fool.

This is a nice, friendly newsgroup where occasional lapses in Usenet
protocols are not jumped on and where learners are gently advised of
the correct way to do things. Of course, if they continue to ignore
the advice and get all precious about their rights to annoy other
people, they will be plonked.


--
Regards.
Richard.

Richard Sherratt

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:42:26 GMT, "L'acrobat"
<husky.65@delete_me.bigpond.com> wrote:

>Yes, we've been through this before - if you have to tell people it's
>clever, it isn't.
>
>It's whiny, which is why it suits you to a tee.
>
>You are simply pathetic.

Ooo er. You are so butch.

^k

Bye.

--
Regards.
Richard.

DaveB

>
> How about a new thread voting who agrees/disagrees so these 2 can ge
> tthe message loud and clear and stop being conveniently ignorant...
>

Ok here's the plan. I've created a hotmail account wgara@hotmail.com
(who gives a rat's arse). If you think it's important to bottom post
send an email to that address with bottom post in the subject. If you
couldn't give a rats whether top or bottom is used send an email with
the topic cgara.

Anyone who wants to check on the polling can logon with the password
toppost . I'm sure none of this will have any impact on DRS's OCD but at
least there will be some data to backup any arguments, <heavy scarcasm>
and we all know how important it is not to post opinions without data
</heavy scarcasm>.

DaveB

DaveB

DaveB wrote:
>
>>
>> How about a new thread voting who agrees/disagrees so these 2 can ge
>> tthe message loud and clear and stop being conveniently ignorant...
>>
>
> Ok here's the plan. I've created a hotmail account wgara@hotmail.com
> (who gives a rat's arse). If you think it's important to bottom post
> send an email to that address with bottom post in the subject. If you
> couldn't give a rats whether top or bottom is used send an email with
> the topic cgara.
>
> Anyone who wants to check on the polling can logon with the password
> toppost . I'm sure none of this will have any impact on DRS's OCD but at
> least there will be some data to backup any arguments, <heavy scarcasm>
> and we all know how important it is not to post opinions without data
> </heavy scarcasm>.
>
> DaveB
>

Doh! stupid hotmail !@#$%^. Send the emails to cgara1@hotmail.com .

DRS

"flyingdutch" <usenet-forum@cyclingforums.com> wrote in message
news:HN7Ec.29311$8h3.9317@fe16.usenetserver.com
> Graeme wrote:
> > h And if that doesn't work, how about we form a lynch mob?
>
> How about a new thread voting who agrees/disagrees so these 2 can ge
> tthe message loud and clear and stop being conveniently ignorant...

I'm not in the least ignorant about Usenet standards and etiquette, unlike
that drop-kick.

--

A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Graeme

"DRS" <drs@remove.this.ihug.com.au> wrote in news:cbrnft$1bg$1
@lust.ihug.co.nz:

> I'm not in the least ignorant about Usenet standards

No, but you are ignorant of when to just drop it. You're flogging a dead
horse.

Graeme