Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > General Mountain Bike Chat > alt.mountain-bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


JD's Trek Posts

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14-04.-2004, 12:04 AM   #16
S o r n i
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

bomba wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:23:25 -0400, Dan Volker wrote:
>
>> Greg, pull your nose out of the pubic hairs in JD's asshole.

>
> I was going to point out the anatomical flaws in this concept, but it
> got me thinking. When do pubic hairs become anal crack hairs? The
> hairs around the varse/barse (perineum) - what category do they fall
> in to?


Maybe Danny is fantasizing that he left some genuine ones there?

Bill "regrets contemplating that" S.


  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 12:17 AM   #17
Dave W
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

bomba <myarse247@hotmail.com> had this to say
newsan.2004.04.13.14.08.38.856616@hotmail.com

> On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:23:25 -0400, Dan Volker wrote:
>
>> Greg, pull your nose out of the pubic hairs in JD's asshole.

>
> I was going to point out the anatomical flaws in this concept, but it
> got me thinking. When do pubic hairs become anal crack hairs? The
> hairs around the varse/barse (perineum) - what category do they fall
> in to?


Do you really want this to be one of those "things that make you say hmm?"
dealios

  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 12:20 AM   #18
p e t e f a g e r l i n
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts


"Dan Volker" <dvolker@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:eRRec.24129$UC4.21610@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
> The people who resemble either of these two the most, don't think THE

SPORT
> OF MOUNTAIN BIKING should be enjoyed any other way than their approach.


Dan, your ability to remain utterly clueleess is simply astounding!


  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 12:56 AM   #19
G.T.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts


"Dan Volker" <dvolker@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:eRRec.24129$UC4.21610@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
>
> "G.T." <getnews1@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
> news:EgEec.21868$Oy.11081@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
> > TBF wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Everyone wants to be the man in their own hood. Alt.MTB is obviously

his
> > > thing, but it's you groupies that make me laugh. Your so eager to kiss

> his
> > > ass that your probably staking out the bathrooms in his town.
> > >

> >
> > You and Dan still don't get it. It has absofuckinlutely nothing to do

> with
> > JD. It has everything to do with heaping grief on 2 completely fucking
> > pompous cockheads like you and Dan V.
> >
> > Greg

>
> Greg, pull your nose out of the pubic hairs in JD's asshole. You don't

even
> know what the real argument has been about, even though you have been
> chiming in from the start. Aside from the backslapping among you and the
> other circle jerkers, the dispute has little to do with good mountain
> biking....the dispute is much more about two views of the sport. There is
> the SS group, that thinks REAL MOUNTAINBIKING is about simplifying,
> lightening, spending less, and somehow getting back to basics ( and of
> course, forgetting that hiking would be the ultimate extension of
> this)....


Fuck, dude, you still don't get it. WTF is wrong with you? Do you realize
that there is no "SS group"? Once you realize that you may just start
getting it.

Greg


  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 12:58 AM   #20
G.T.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts


"Dan Volker" <dvolker@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:xJSec.10273$Yw5.7109@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
>
> "bomba" <myarse247@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> newsan.2004.04.13.14.08.38.856616@hotmail.com...
> > On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:23:25 -0400, Dan Volker wrote:
> >

>
> > You do realise that the majority of people here have already ridden with
> > other people on the group, don't you? There are ""group get-togethers""
> > throughout the world. The difference is, we just want to ride with each
> > other on nice trails, not settle scores. I think this final point

probably
> > illustrates our differences of opinion rather well.
> >

>
> You may see this as "settling scores". I don't. My guess would be that in
> virtually every case, when you have people who have been in a heated

usenet
> debate, actually getting together, the result will be friendly and

amicable.
> In the case of this mountain biking group and the threads argued about, it
> would be more of an understanding what each other means..a semantics type
> thing, and after riding with them, having a better idea of why they sound
> the way they do with their posts. No matter how much of a challenge I may
> have aimed at JD, when I do get the chance to ride with him, I am going to
> be planning on a fun trip, and I'm going to expect him to be alot more
> enjoyable to ride with in real life, than to talk to on the NG. Any
> challenge would be relatively unimportant, the enjoyment of the ride would
> be the big issue. I'm enjoying talking smack about SSers too much, to let

a
> little thing like who actually wins the challenge to concern me :-)

But
> of course, if JD was on a SS at Quiet Waters, I would also enjoy having to
> wait for him to catch up every 5 minutes or so :-)
>


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA,

thank you for starting my day off with a laugh.

Greg


  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 01:01 AM   #21
BB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:23:25 -0400, Dan Volker wrote:

> Greg, pull your nose out of the pubic hairs in JD's asshole.


I think bomba covered this one all too well.

> You don't even
> know what the real argument has been about, even though you have been
> chiming in from the start.


What makes you think there's one single "real argument" in this thread?
TBF's original thread was about "JRA" - just riding around - which has a
hell of a lot to do with the "traditional" view of mountain biking.

> Aside from the backslapping among you and the
> other circle jerkers, the dispute has little to do with good mountain
> biking....the dispute is much more about two views of the sport.


NO, that was just YOUR personal beef.

His dispute with JD was about brands of full-suspension bikes, and if
you'd read the thread you'd notice there was no mention of singlespeeds.
JD's broken quite a few bike frames in his years. Personally, I think that
is mostly due to the fact that he's a behemoth so what breaks for him
might not break for a lot of others...but that's why I haven't been
involved in this thread.

--
-BB-
To reply to me, drop the attitude (from my e-mail address, at least)
  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 01:21 AM   #22
MattB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

BB wrote:
<snip pretty reasonable stuff>
> but that's why I haven't been involved in this thread.


I just try and stay the hell away from any of these kinds of threads (maybe
I'll write a "let me count the ways" sonnet sometime). Not my cup of tea,
really.

I sure do like to ride. Had a fine SS outing last night despite cold and
wind. Good stuff!

Matt (although sometimes, like a black hole I get sucked in no matter how
hard I try to resist)


  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 01:21 AM   #23
Corvus Corvax
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

"TBF" <jr.miller@rogers.com> wrote
[... blah ...]

You know, if JD didn't exist, we would have to invent him.

CC
  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 01:24 AM   #24
S o r n i
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

Corvus Corvax wrote:
> "TBF" <jr.miller@rogers.com> wrote
> [... blah ...]
>
> You know, if JD didn't exist, we would have to invent him.


JD is the AM-B equivalent to rec.cycling.*'s Fabrizio Mazzoleni.

Bill "GT and I know -- we tried to find the shack and it was just a mailbox
in a strip mall" S.


  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 01:33 AM   #25
Dan Volker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts


"G.T." <getnews1@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
news:%4Uec.51045$Wt.16685@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Dan Volker" <dvolker@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:eRRec.24129$UC4.21610@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
> >
> > "G.T." <getnews1@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
> > news:EgEec.21868$Oy.11081@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
> > > TBF wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Everyone wants to be the man in their own hood. Alt.MTB is obviously

> his
> > > > thing, but it's you groupies that make me laugh. Your so eager to

kiss
> > his
> > > > ass that your probably staking out the bathrooms in his town.
> > > >
> > >
> > > You and Dan still don't get it. It has absofuckinlutely nothing to do

> > with
> > > JD. It has everything to do with heaping grief on 2 completely

fucking
> > > pompous cockheads like you and Dan V.
> > >
> > > Greg

> >
> > Greg, pull your nose out of the pubic hairs in JD's asshole. You don't

> even
> > know what the real argument has been about, even though you have been
> > chiming in from the start. Aside from the backslapping among you and the
> > other circle jerkers, the dispute has little to do with good mountain
> > biking....the dispute is much more about two views of the sport. There

is
> > the SS group, that thinks REAL MOUNTAINBIKING is about simplifying,
> > lightening, spending less, and somehow getting back to basics ( and of
> > course, forgetting that hiking would be the ultimate extension of
> > this)....

>
> Fuck, dude, you still don't get it. WTF is wrong with you? Do you

realize
> that there is no "SS group"? Once you realize that you may just start
> getting it.
>
> Greg


Greg, your delusional. There is a dominant posting presence on this NG from
people who either are fanatical SSers, or who are buddies of these guys, and
so they enjoy playing the same posting game.
Dan V


  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 01:37 AM   #26
BB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:21:05 -0600, MattB wrote:

> I sure do like to ride. Had a fine SS outing last night despite cold and
> wind. Good stuff!


Uh-oh, he said the "S" word. ;-)

I nearly had a fine outing despite cold and wind. Ended up spending all
evening helping my daughter with a school project - couldn't resist, it
was a trebuchet! I let her do all the design work, making me mostly a
laborer, but it was still fun just doing things together.

> Matt (although sometimes, like a black hole I get sucked in no matter how
> hard I try to resist)


I know, I know.

--
-BB-
To reply to me, drop the attitude (from my e-mail address, at least)
  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 01:46 AM   #27
Penny S
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

Dan Volker wrote:
> "G.T." <getnews1@dslextreme.com> wrote in message

There is a dominant posting presence on this
> NG from people who either are fanatical SSers, or who are buddies of
> these guys, and so they enjoy playing the same posting game.
> Dan V



cool Dan... care to show us the statiscal breakdown on that? Do you have a
breakdown by topic or poster, and did you use a percentile basis,
estimation, or are you manually tallying everything.

this I gotta see.

penny


  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 01:53 AM   #28
S o r n i
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

Penny S wrote:
> Dan Volker wrote:
>> "G.T." <getnews1@dslextreme.com> wrote in message

> There is a dominant posting presence on this
>> NG from people who either are fanatical SSers, or who are buddies of
>> these guys, and so they enjoy playing the same posting game.
>> Dan V

>
>
> cool Dan... care to show us the statiscal breakdown on that? Do you
> have a breakdown by topic or poster, and did you use a percentile
> basis, estimation, or are you manually tallying everything.


I blame Bill Wheeler.

Bill "for everything" S.


  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 01:53 AM   #29
Penny S
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts

BB wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:21:05 -0600, MattB wrote:
>
>> I sure do like to ride. Had a fine SS outing last night despite cold
>> and wind. Good stuff!

>
> Uh-oh, he said the "S" word. ;-)
>
> I nearly had a fine outing despite cold and wind. Ended up spending
> all evening helping my daughter with a school project - couldn't
> resist, it was a trebuchet! I let her do all the design work, making
> me mostly a laborer, but it was still fun just doing things together.


My son built a scale model ballista a few years ago. We had to video the
results, he couldn't take a weapon to school ( roll eyes) It shoots pop
cans and tennis balls.
There are lots of cool web site out there dedicated to building these
things!!

penny



  Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2004, 02:11 AM   #30
Dan Volker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: JD's Trek Posts


"BB" <bbauerAtitude@freeshell.org> wrote in message
news:c5h2tm$1j1vt$1@ID-130844.news.uni-berlin.de...
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:23:25 -0400, Dan Volker wrote:



>
> NO, that was just YOUR personal beef.
>
> His dispute with JD was about brands of full-suspension bikes, and if
> you'd read the thread you'd notice there was no mention of singlespeeds.
> JD's broken quite a few bike frames in his years. Personally, I think that
> is mostly due to the fact that he's a behemoth so what breaks for him
> might not break for a lot of others...but that's why I haven't been
> involved in this thread.
>


OK, valid point.
My post was colored by expectations...as would your if MV posted to you
about why you should not ride on a specific trail ( you'd expect an agenda
from him, and you'd pretty well guess what it would be ).

Dan V


  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com