![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:30:51 -0500, Tom Sherman
<tsherman@qconline.com> wrote: >> MAPLE or SPRUCE may be stronger. > >How wood you know? I'm in the construction business, so I mite (is that the best I can come up with?) know this sort of stuff. Er, seriously, engineers insist that kiln dried spruce is stronger, but it sure is brittle. IME, hem fir has proven itself to be much tougher, and I've yet to load KD spruce in any direction where it's stronger than hem fir. I hope you aren't board (hah! better...) of my lumbering (woo hoo!) prose. -- Rick Onanian |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Rick Onanian wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:30:51 -0500, Tom Sherman > <tsherman@qconline.com> wrote: > >>>MAPLE or SPRUCE may be stronger. >> >>How wood you know? > > > I'm in the construction business, so I mite (is that the best I can > come up with?) know this sort of stuff. > > Er, seriously, engineers insist that kiln dried spruce is stronger, > but it sure is brittle.... Loaded longitudinally, tangentially, or radial to the grain? -- Tom Sherman – Quad City Area |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:51:23 -0500, Tom Sherman
<tsherman@qconline.com> wrote: >> Er, seriously, engineers insist that kiln dried spruce is stronger, >> but it sure is brittle.... > >Loaded longitudinally, tangentially, or radial to the grain? In my experience, all of the above, in compression, stretch, span, beam, whatever types of loads. I've just not had a real-world experience where KD spruce has survived more load than hem fir. All combinations of the above loads do happen, between cutting, nailing, screwing, loading, removing, breaking, and all the other things you do with wood. I've used both species as parts of walls, staging, makeshift tools, pavement protection under heavy/sharp stuff, tables, and as ultra-rough-service boxes. -- Rick Onanian |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What have I started? I'm sorry I asked ;-)
B "Rick Onanian" <spamsink@cox.net> wrote in message news:dvf6f05hqssi1i2ebou3dft224ffaqnpuu@4ax.com... > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:51:23 -0500, Tom Sherman > <tsherman@qconline.com> wrote: > >> Er, seriously, engineers insist that kiln dried spruce is stronger, > >> but it sure is brittle.... > > > >Loaded longitudinally, tangentially, or radial to the grain? > > In my experience, all of the above, in compression, stretch, span, > beam, whatever types of loads. I've just not had a real-world > experience where KD spruce has survived more load than hem fir. > > All combinations of the above loads do happen, between cutting, > nailing, screwing, loading, removing, breaking, and all the other > things you do with wood. I've used both species as parts of walls, > staging, makeshift tools, pavement protection under heavy/sharp > stuff, tables, and as ultra-rough-service boxes. > -- > Rick Onanian |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:27:29 -0400, Rick Onanian <spamsink@cox.net>
wrote: >Er, seriously, engineers insist that kiln dried spruce is stronger, >but it sure is brittle. IME, hem fir has proven itself to be much >tougher, and I've yet to load KD spruce in any direction where it's >stronger than hem fir. OTOH, bamboo really has been used, especially for track. Evidently someone decided then to try to make bamboo bikes, but those didn't work out so well. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:31:15 -0400, Curtis L. Russell
<curtis@md-bicycling.org> wrote: >OTOH, bamboo really has been used, especially for track. Evidently >someone decided then to try to make bamboo bikes, but those didn't >work out so well. Actually, I thought the bamboo bikes (occasionally discussed here) were supposed to be pretty good. Bamboo flooring is beautiful. -- Rick Onanian |
|
|