Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


What was Lance playing at???

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-07.-2004, 09:24 AM   #1
Cycling expert
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 36
Default What was Lance playing at???

I was wondering what you guys thought about the Stage 3 fiasco, but more importantly, Lance Armstrong's decision not to wait for Iban Mayo.
I was quite disgusted, because Mayo and others waited for Lance on the way to Luz Ardiden last year. Also Lance had previously waited for Jan Ullrich a few years back when he took a tumble descending the Tormulet (i think)
How did Lance see this episode differently to those two, I would have thought all three were the same, GC riders taking falls, peloton waits, no?

Could it have something to do with Lance being afraid of Mayo? because when he waited for Jan he already had the tour sewn up?
Did he not know that Mayo had fallen?
Or did he not think about it?

To me, its a really strange episode in the tour so far.
Cycling expert is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07.-2004, 09:51 AM   #2
birdman23
Registered User
 
birdman23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 571
Default Re: What was Lance playing at???

Quote:
Originally posted by Cycling expert
I was wondering what you guys thought about the Stage 3 fiasco, but more importantly, Lance Armstrong's decision not to wait for Iban Mayo.
I was quite disgusted, because Mayo and others waited for Lance on the way to Luz Ardiden last year. Also Lance had previously waited for Jan Ullrich a few years back when he took a tumble descending the Tormulet (i think)
How did Lance see this episode differently to those two, I would have thought all three were the same, GC riders taking falls, peloton waits, no?

Could it have something to do with Lance being afraid of Mayo? because when he waited for Jan he already had the tour sewn up?
Did he not know that Mayo had fallen?
Or did he not think about it?

To me, its a really strange episode in the tour so far.


There are a lot of other threads discussing this. Lance was not the only one who didn't wait. Phonak and T-Mobile were at the front pushing right along with Postal. The peloton had already been split into several different groups before Mayo crashed. Mayo said in an interview that he would have done the same thing if Lance, jan, or Tyler went down behind him on that stage.
__________________
May the road you ride be a good road!
birdman23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07.-2004, 10:01 AM   #3
birdman23
Registered User
 
birdman23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 571
Default

From Mayo's own mouth. Interview for ProCycling.com

http://www.procycling.com/news_archive.aspx?ID=191


Asked if he was surprised when his yellow jersey rivals took advantage of his fall rather than waiting for him, Mayo said: “That was the normal thing to do. I would have done the same thing in the place of Armstrong and co.”
__________________
May the road you ride be a good road!
birdman23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07.-2004, 10:16 AM   #4
ed073
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,488
Default

Mayo's crash was a racing incident, if it had been reversed, E-E would have put the hammer down.
Armstrong's fall last year had nothing to do with the race, it was a spectator. Etiquette and pride meant the others couldn't profit.
ed073 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07.-2004, 10:32 AM   #5
Cam the Ram
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 28
Default

I think Mayo needs a better team, before he thinks of winning the Tour. He is a great rider, but how can he have any shot with such a horrible team?
__________________
"We improve ourselves by victories over ourself. There must be contests, and you must win."

- Edward Gibbon (1737 - 1794)
Cam the Ram is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07.-2004, 11:05 AM   #6
Lisbon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Traverse City Michigan
Posts: 32
Send a message via AIM to Lisbon
Default

Everyone has been saying that Armstrong should have waited but, how about the other 180 people in that group? They were all going 40 mph there is no way to stop a group that big and wait it was just racing, the guy crashed and lost time.
Lisbon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07.-2004, 11:09 AM   #7
ed073
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,488
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Cam the Ram
I think Mayo needs a better team, before he thinks of winning the Tour. He is a great rider, but how can he have any shot with such a horrible team?


Greg Lemond won in 1989 with basically Johan Lammerts and Museeuw.
ed073 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07.-2004, 11:48 AM   #8
MGSuarez
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 52
Default

Armstrong did the right thing. I dont know why he waited for Ullrich either when he crashed. Ullrich was the one pushing the pace on the downhill. If you push the limit and screw up thats not your opponents fault. Armstrong was in the yellow when they waited. Also like someone else stated earlier spectator involvment caused Armstrongs crash. In respect for a true leaders jersey they waited. Besides what were they going to do situp in the middle of the cobbles and make it more dangerous. Take it easy on the the Lance bashing.
MGSuarez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07.-2004, 11:53 AM   #9
ed073
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,488
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MGSuarez
Armstrong did the right thing. I dont know why he waited for Ullrich either when he crashed. Ullrich was the one pushing the pace on the downhill. If you push the limit and screw up thats not your opponents fault. Armstrong was in the yellow when they waited. Also like someone else stated earlier spectator involvment caused Armstrongs crash. In respect for a true leaders jersey they waited. Besides what were they going to do situp in the middle of the cobbles and make it more dangerous. Take it easy on the the Lance bashing.



yay!
ed073 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07.-2004, 02:56 PM   #10
tcklyde
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,435
Send a message via AIM to tcklyde
Default

Personally, I think they should have waited. Postal, Phonak and T-Mobile all could have reigned the peloton in. But they picked up the pace after the cobbles and finished Mayo off. Mayo was a contender and I would have loved to see and equitable battle in the mountains.

I don't fault anyone in particular. Mayo crashed in a really bad spot. But the GC contenders and their teams definitely took advantage.
__________________
Harry
tcklyde is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07.-2004, 03:16 PM   #11
Beastt
Registered User
 
Beastt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Arizona (USA)
Posts: 1,141
Send a message via AIM to Beastt Send a message via Yahoo to Beastt
Default

There seems to be a lot lost on the concept of waiting in the Tour de France. If the leader falls, (while leading) on a key stage, then the pack waits. If anyone falls on a flat stage, especially during the initial stages of the Tour, you don't wait. It would be chaos if the whole peloton tried to stop everytime any rider fell. Especially this year with all the falls and crashes.

I can't imagine the pack coming to a halt on a flat stage if Armstrong were to fall. In fact, Armstrong has gone down at least once so far and I haven't seen anyone getting upset because the entire membership of the peloton didn't come to a screeching halt to allow him to get back up, dust himself off, check out his bike and get back into a rhythm. There are simply key times when you wait and the rest of the time when you don't. It's hard to put into black and white but it's fairly easy to understand once you start to feel the race tactics.
Beastt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07.-2004, 03:44 PM   #12
gntlmn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Anchorage, Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,672
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by tcklyde
Personally, I think they should have waited. Postal, Phonak and T-Mobile all could have reigned the peloton in. But they picked up the pace after the cobbles and finished Mayo off. Mayo was a contender and I would have loved to see and equitable battle in the mountains.

I don't fault anyone in particular. Mayo crashed in a really bad spot. But the GC contenders and their teams definitely took advantage.


Don't worry. You'll see Mayo going ballistic in the mountains. That I'm sure of. And the others will follow.

It's a long way to Paris.
gntlmn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-07.-2004, 02:09 PM   #13
Ky Wildcat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 4
Default Re: What was Lance playing at???

You don't wait going 30-35 mph on cobblestones, way too dangerous. His team should be able to go back and help him return to the peloton but his team is weak, so they coudn't.
Ky Wildcat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-07.-2004, 02:31 AM   #14
meehs
Registered User
 
meehs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 1,848
Default Re: What was Lance playing at???

Bob Roll commented on this yesterday on OLN. He said that when you have the entire peleton charging that hard and one of the GC contenders crashes, you don't wait. He said that in that situation, it's up to the rider that crashed and his teammates to get back to the peleton.
meehs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-07.-2004, 10:09 PM   #15
Stevedvg
Crash-test dummy...
 
Stevedvg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Africa
Posts: 96
Send a message via ICQ to Stevedvg
Default Re: What was Lance playing at???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cycling expert
I was wondering what you guys thought about the Stage 3 fiasco, but more importantly, Lance Armstrong's decision not to wait for Iban Mayo.
I was quite disgusted, because Mayo and others waited for Lance on the way to Luz Ardiden last year.


Why didn't Jan Ullrich wait or Tyler Hamilton or Roberto Heras for that matter? Why didn’t the other 150 riders of the peloton wait? Why is Lance Armstrong solely to blame for Iban Mayo's time deficit?

Would you have expected the peloton to wait for Lance if he had fallen? I really wonder why some people feel obliged to take cheep shots at a superb cyclist at the top of his game . And you can go on about his private life until you’re blue in the face but the bottom line is what Lance does after he climbs off his bicycle has nothing to do with anybody else.

I bet you’re going to feel even more disgusted when he enters Paris wearing Yellow yet again…I, on the other hand, hope he rides the wheels off the rest of the field!

Allez Lance!! !!!!
__________________
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
Stevedvg is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet