![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:17:52 -0600, carlfogel@comcast.net wrote:
> >Dear Bob, > >Your plea raises an interesting question. > >It's often been stated here that wheel-balancing is >pointless on bicycles because the wheel mass is so small >compared to the bike and rider. >Carl Fogel Hi Carl: I do wish that I did know more about the theory involved here. My statements here are based more on experience (which may not carry much weight here.. G). I know that when you spin a bike or cycle wheel at speed, such as we used to do with a stroboscopic automotive wheel balancer machine, that the forces on the free wheel are not all in the plane of the wheel and that some side to side motion is generated. You can easily demonstrate this by spinning a freely suspended bike wheel with a shop compressed air nozzle and you will see a "shimmy" component as well as the vertical out of balance forces. I am told, ( as were you, it seems - G), that this can not effect a bicycle at speed. But, we used to balance the motorcycle wheels by wrapping heavy gauge solder on the spokes at the "light" point as indicated by the stroboscopic balancer (or simply by letting the wheel seek its own heavy spot if the bearing and brake drag would permit. This would usually eliminate the deadly "speed wobble" which surely was a form of what we are refering to as "shimmy". I agree, it happens at harmonics and can be very exagerated if occuring at a resonant frequency of the structure of the machine involved. > >How heavy would an unbalanced weight on a wheel have to be >before wheel-balancing became worthwhile in the eyes of the >naysayers? > An out of balance condition of 1/2oz. on a car at the wheel rim can easily be felt at road speed as a vibration (probably mostly in the vertical plane), with a much heavier wheel and tire than the bike, so I feel that the reflector weight on a bike tire is sure to cause some effect even if mounted opposite the valve stem, which is supposedly the "heavy spot". In my case, with one of my first pedal powered bikes, a Trek 750 "Cross", I recognized what was happening just before it shimmied me off of the road into the woods. After spinning the wheels with shop air to see what the wheel balance was like at speed, and removing the reflectors, which made a big improvment in the amount of vertical movement (and the side to side as well), I never had the shimmy event occur again in many thousands of miles of riding this bike. I realize that this is purely emperical and therefore of little value here. So while I am admitting that I cannot argue this point in theory, I ask only that doubters put a reflector ( or an equivalent weight) on a front bike tire, suspend the bike so that the fork can turn freely, spin at road speed by whatever means (shop compressed air nozzle is great for this) and observe the effect and then surely someone here can (and most likely will), theorize. BG. Bob.. rflumere@comcast.net P.S. Something to do with gyroscopic preccesion as the out of balance mass revolves around center creating a force at right angles to the primary out of balance force... rambling now..sorry ?????? Bob Flumere rflumere@comcast.net |
|
|