![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> I do full blood counts for a living and I could probably
> spot an EPO taker's at ten paces. They will all of course > die prematurely as a result, as do mountain dwellers who > move down to the valleys. Eh? Why's dat den? And how do you recognise them? Being a sea level dweller, will I live longer if I move up to the mountains? |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:09:48 +0100, "Richard Goodman"
<rsk@NOSPAM.homechoice.co.uk> wrote (more or less): ... >either way I think it's disgraceful to seek competitive >advantage through drugs - even if the 'advantage' is only >to stay on a par with other drug-users. Quite - it appears to be more a case of avoiding competitive disadvantage by not avoiding drugs... -- Cheers, Euan Gawnsoft: http://www.gawnsoft.co.sr Symbian/Epoc wiki: http://html.dnsalias.net:1122 Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk) http://html.dnsalias.net/gawnsoft/smalltalk |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mark Thompson <pleasegivegenerously@warmmail.com> wrote in message news:<Xns951B9D91BFEApleasegivegenerously@195.92.193.157>...
> > I do full blood counts for a living and I could probably > > spot an EPO taker's at ten paces. They will all of > > course die prematurely as a result, as do mountain > > dwellers who move down to the valleys. > > Eh? Why's dat den? And how do you recognise them? Being a > sea level dweller, will I live longer if I move up to the > mountains? Because their Hct would be over the normal range (this is how UIC do it I think) If you moved up to the mountains your RBC would go up, but if you came back down it would stay high. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
MartinM wrote:
> > Because their Hct would be over the normal range (this is > how UIC do it I think) If you moved up to the mountains > your RBC would go up, but if you came back down it would > stay high. My understanding was that when you came back down it would revert back to normal over two to three weeks. Tony |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 3 Jul 2004 00:53:46 -0700, Martinm2@wcms.org.uk (MartinM) wrote:
>Mark Thompson <pleasegivegenerously@warmmail.com> wrote in >message news:<Xns951B9D91BFEApleasegivegenerously@195.92.1- >93.157>... >> > I do full blood counts for a living and I could >> > probably spot an EPO taker's at ten paces. They will >> > all of course die prematurely as a result, as do >> > mountain dwellers who move down to the valleys. >> >> Eh? Why's dat den? And how do you recognise them? Being a >> sea level dweller, will I live longer if I move up to the >> mountains? > >Because their Hct would be over the normal range (this is >how UIC do it I think) They do - what would you consider the "normal range" to be? Regards! Stephen |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Steve McGinty <steve_DOT_mcginty@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:<c69de0dfokdnrs3pi3fjmu8gevfti52kcp@4ax.com>...
> On 3 Jul 2004 00:53:46 -0700, Martinm2@wcms.org.uk > (MartinM) wrote: > > >Mark Thompson <pleasegivegenerously@warmmail.com> wrote > >in message news:<Xns951B9D91BFEApleasegivegenerously@195- > >.92.193.157>... > >> > I do full blood counts for a living and I could > >> > probably spot an EPO taker's at ten paces. They will > >> > all of course die prematurely as a result, as do > >> > mountain dwellers who move down to the valleys. > >> > >> Eh? Why's dat den? And how do you recognise them? Being > >> a sea level dweller, will I live longer if I move up to > >> the mountains? > > > >Because their Hct would be over the normal range (this is > >how UIC do it I think) > > They do - what would you consider the "normal range" to > be? > > Regards! Stephen around 0.45 just found this: Can a normal person have a high EPO level? Yes. For example, EPO has been misused as a performance- enhancing drug in athletes such as cyclists (in the Tour de France), long-distance runners, speed skaters, and Nordic (cross-country) skiers. When misused in such situations, EPO is thought to be especially dangerous (perhaps because dehydration due to vigorous exercise can further increase the thickness (viscosity) of the blood, raising the risk for heart attacks and strokes. EPO has been banned by the Tour, the Olympics, and other sports organizations. google for polycythaemia (or omit the first a if searching US sites) as well if you think it is safe. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
One point to come from this, David Millar is the only
sportsman (to my knowledge) ever to admit to "using". Not even Ben Johnson owned up. John Clayton www.ossettmouldings.com |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:41:17 +0100, John Clayton
<John@ossett-mouldings.demon.co.uk> wrote: >One point to come from this, David Millar is the only >sportsman (to my knowledge) ever to admit to "using". Not >even Ben Johnson owned up. Did Alan Baxter own up or did he make the usual excuse of "I didna know it was a bad batch"? James |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
James Hodson wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:41:17 +0100, John Clayton <John@ossett- > mouldings.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > >>One point to come from this, David Millar is the only >>sportsman (to my knowledge) ever to admit to "using". Not >>even Ben Johnson owned up. > > > Did Alan Baxter own up or did he make the usual excuse of > "I didna know it was a bad batch"? > > James Slightly unfair, he bought and used a nasal spray that was OK in Europe, but had a different formulation in the US (and yes he should have read the ingredients) Dave |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:12:02 +0100, DaveR
<ann@robertson74dotfsnet.co.uk> wrote: >Slightly unfair, he bought and used a nasal spray that was >OK in Europe, but had a different formulation in the US >(and yes he should have read the ingredients) Why let the truth get in the way of a good story. He would say that, wouldn't he. And many, many more ... James |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:19:11 GMT, James Hodson
<jUNDERSCOREhodson@ntlworld.com.invalid> wrote (more or less): >On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:12:02 +0100, DaveR ><ann@robertson74dotfsnet.co.uk> wrote: > >>Slightly unfair, he bought and used a nasal spray that was >>OK in Europe, but had a different formulation in the US >>(and yes he should have read the ingredients) > >Why let the truth get in the way of a good story. He would >say that, wouldn't he. And many, many more ... IIRC, it was Vicks sinex nasal spray. And the added agent in the US version is pseudafed. -- Cheers, Euan Gawnsoft: http://www.gawnsoft.co.sr Symbian/Epoc wiki: http://html.dnsalias.net:1122 Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk) http://html.dnsalias.net/gawnsoft/smalltalk |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In news:b903f0dpa7tr1s9q3b4027i430t64iib8v@4ax.com,
Gawnsoft <xlucid@users.sourceforge.remove.this.antispam.net> typed: > On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:19:11 GMT, James Hodson > <jUNDERSCOREhodson@ntlworld.com.invalid> wrote (more > or less): > >> On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:12:02 +0100, DaveR >> <ann@robertson74dotfsnet.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Slightly unfair, he bought and used a nasal spray that >>> was OK in Europe, but had a different formulation in the >>> US (and yes he should have read the ingredients) >> >> Why let the truth get in the way of a good story. He >> would say that, wouldn't he. And many, many more ... > > IIRC, it was Vicks sinex nasal spray. And the added agent > in the US version is pseudafed. IIRC, it's pseudoephedrine in Europe and ephedrine in the US. But ICBW. A |
|
|