Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > uk.rec.cycling > uk.rec.cycling arch > uk.rec.cycling archive
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Not looking good for MIllar

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-07.-2004, 09:15 AM   #16
Mark Thompson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

> I do full blood counts for a living and I could probably
> spot an EPO taker's at ten paces. They will all of course
> die prematurely as a result, as do mountain dwellers who
> move down to the valleys.

Eh? Why's dat den? And how do you recognise them? Being a
sea level dweller, will I live longer if I move up to the
mountains?
 
Old 03-07.-2004, 10:02 AM   #17
Gawnsoft
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:09:48 +0100, "Richard Goodman"
<rsk@NOSPAM.homechoice.co.uk> wrote (more or less): ...
>either way I think it's disgraceful to seek competitive
>advantage through drugs - even if the 'advantage' is only
>to stay on a par with other drug-users.

Quite - it appears to be more a case of avoiding competitive
disadvantage by not avoiding drugs...
--
Cheers, Euan Gawnsoft: http://www.gawnsoft.co.sr
Symbian/Epoc wiki: http://html.dnsalias.net:1122 Smalltalk
links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk)
http://html.dnsalias.net/gawnsoft/smalltalk
 
Old 03-07.-2004, 05:02 PM   #18
Martinm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

Mark Thompson <pleasegivegenerously@warmmail.com> wrote in message news:<Xns951B9D91BFEApleasegivegenerously@195.92.193.157>...
> > I do full blood counts for a living and I could probably
> > spot an EPO taker's at ten paces. They will all of
> > course die prematurely as a result, as do mountain
> > dwellers who move down to the valleys.
>
> Eh? Why's dat den? And how do you recognise them? Being a
> sea level dweller, will I live longer if I move up to the
> mountains?

Because their Hct would be over the normal range (this is
how UIC do it I think) If you moved up to the mountains
your RBC would go up, but if you came back down it would
stay high.
 
Old 03-07.-2004, 07:31 PM   #19
Tony Raven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

MartinM wrote:
>
> Because their Hct would be over the normal range (this is
> how UIC do it I think) If you moved up to the mountains
> your RBC would go up, but if you came back down it would
> stay high.

My understanding was that when you came back down it would
revert back to normal over two to three weeks.

Tony
 
Old 03-07.-2004, 09:31 PM   #20
Steve McGinty
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

On 3 Jul 2004 00:53:46 -0700, Martinm2@wcms.org.uk (MartinM) wrote:

>Mark Thompson <pleasegivegenerously@warmmail.com> wrote in
>message news:<Xns951B9D91BFEApleasegivegenerously@195.92.1-
>93.157>...
>> > I do full blood counts for a living and I could
>> > probably spot an EPO taker's at ten paces. They will
>> > all of course die prematurely as a result, as do
>> > mountain dwellers who move down to the valleys.
>>
>> Eh? Why's dat den? And how do you recognise them? Being a
>> sea level dweller, will I live longer if I move up to the
>> mountains?
>
>Because their Hct would be over the normal range (this is
>how UIC do it I think)

They do - what would you consider the "normal range" to be?

Regards! Stephen
 
Old 04-07.-2004, 03:22 AM   #21
Martinm
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

Steve McGinty <steve_DOT_mcginty@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:<c69de0dfokdnrs3pi3fjmu8gevfti52kcp@4ax.com>...
> On 3 Jul 2004 00:53:46 -0700, Martinm2@wcms.org.uk
> (MartinM) wrote:
>
> >Mark Thompson <pleasegivegenerously@warmmail.com> wrote
> >in message news:<Xns951B9D91BFEApleasegivegenerously@195-
> >.92.193.157>...
> >> > I do full blood counts for a living and I could
> >> > probably spot an EPO taker's at ten paces. They will
> >> > all of course die prematurely as a result, as do
> >> > mountain dwellers who move down to the valleys.
> >>
> >> Eh? Why's dat den? And how do you recognise them? Being
> >> a sea level dweller, will I live longer if I move up to
> >> the mountains?
> >
> >Because their Hct would be over the normal range (this is
> >how UIC do it I think)
>
> They do - what would you consider the "normal range" to
> be?
>
> Regards! Stephen

around 0.45

just found this:

Can a normal person have a high EPO level?

Yes. For example, EPO has been misused as a performance-
enhancing drug in athletes such as cyclists (in the Tour de
France), long-distance runners, speed skaters, and Nordic
(cross-country) skiers. When misused in such situations, EPO
is thought to be especially dangerous (perhaps because
dehydration due to vigorous exercise can further increase
the thickness (viscosity) of the blood, raising the risk for
heart attacks and strokes. EPO has been banned by the Tour,
the Olympics, and other sports organizations.

google for polycythaemia (or omit the first a if searching
US sites) as well if you think it is safe.
 
Old 06-07.-2004, 06:48 PM   #22
John Clayton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

One point to come from this, David Millar is the only
sportsman (to my knowledge) ever to admit to "using". Not
even Ben Johnson owned up.

John Clayton www.ossettmouldings.com
 
Old 06-07.-2004, 08:01 PM   #23
James Hodson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:41:17 +0100, John Clayton
<John@ossett-mouldings.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>One point to come from this, David Millar is the only
>sportsman (to my knowledge) ever to admit to "using". Not
>even Ben Johnson owned up.

Did Alan Baxter own up or did he make the usual excuse of "I
didna know it was a bad batch"?

James
 
Old 07-07.-2004, 04:32 AM   #24
Daver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

James Hodson wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:41:17 +0100, John Clayton <John@ossett-
> mouldings.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>One point to come from this, David Millar is the only
>>sportsman (to my knowledge) ever to admit to "using". Not
>>even Ben Johnson owned up.
>
>
> Did Alan Baxter own up or did he make the usual excuse of
> "I didna know it was a bad batch"?
>
> James
Slightly unfair, he bought and used a nasal spray that was
OK in Europe, but had a different formulation in the US (and
yes he should have read the ingredients)

Dave
 
Old 11-07.-2004, 08:04 PM   #25
James Hodson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:12:02 +0100, DaveR
<ann@robertson74dotfsnet.co.uk> wrote:

>Slightly unfair, he bought and used a nasal spray that was
>OK in Europe, but had a different formulation in the US
>(and yes he should have read the ingredients)

Why let the truth get in the way of a good story. He would
say that, wouldn't he. And many, many more ...

James
 
Old 12-07.-2004, 04:33 AM   #26
Gawnsoft
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:19:11 GMT, James Hodson
<jUNDERSCOREhodson@ntlworld.com.invalid> wrote (more or less):

>On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:12:02 +0100, DaveR
><ann@robertson74dotfsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Slightly unfair, he bought and used a nasal spray that was
>>OK in Europe, but had a different formulation in the US
>>(and yes he should have read the ingredients)
>
>Why let the truth get in the way of a good story. He would
>say that, wouldn't he. And many, many more ...

IIRC, it was Vicks sinex nasal spray. And the added agent in
the US version is pseudafed.

--
Cheers, Euan Gawnsoft: http://www.gawnsoft.co.sr
Symbian/Epoc wiki: http://html.dnsalias.net:1122 Smalltalk
links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk)
http://html.dnsalias.net/gawnsoft/smalltalk
 
Old 13-07.-2004, 07:32 AM   #27
Ambrose Nankive
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not looking good for MIllar

In news:b903f0dpa7tr1s9q3b4027i430t64iib8v@4ax.com,
Gawnsoft <xlucid@users.sourceforge.remove.this.antispam.net> typed:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:19:11 GMT, James Hodson
> <jUNDERSCOREhodson@ntlworld.com.invalid> wrote (more
> or less):
>
>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:12:02 +0100, DaveR
>> <ann@robertson74dotfsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Slightly unfair, he bought and used a nasal spray that
>>> was OK in Europe, but had a different formulation in the
>>> US (and yes he should have read the ingredients)
>>
>> Why let the truth get in the way of a good story. He
>> would say that, wouldn't he. And many, many more ...
>
> IIRC, it was Vicks sinex nasal spray. And the added agent
> in the US version is pseudafed.

IIRC, it's pseudoephedrine in Europe and ephedrine in the
US. But ICBW.

A
 
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:20 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet