![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:24:06 -0400, David Kerber <ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net> wrote:
>In article <20040703091015.04124.00000831@mb-m15.aol.com>, >dnvrfox@aol.com says... >> >With my $99 junky bicycle, on a wide road, and great >> >visibility, I would consider anything over 50MPH is "too >> >fast". >> > >> >It's basically the speed when you start losing fully >> >control of your bike. >> >> Okay - so you agree that each of us has a "too fast," >> yours being 50, mine being 40 and someone elses being >> 30, right? >> >> I know guys whose "too fast" is 60 mph. > >I don't know what mine is; I hit 46 over the weekend on >a big hill, and was hoping for 50. It felt good, and I >felt like I was nowhere near my comfort limit. A nice >solid, stable touring frame may have something to do >with that, though. > Has an animal run out in front of you yet? ;-) Ben |
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <mgqle09epd23mr4m0iqgp3ln77pbtq55h7@4ax.com>, spaXm-mXe-anXd-
paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com says... > On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:24:06 -0400, David Kerber > <ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net> wrote: > > >In article <20040703091015.04124.00000831@mb- > >m15.aol.com>, dnvrfox@aol.com says... > >> >With my $99 junky bicycle, on a wide road, and great > >> >visibility, I would consider anything over 50MPH is > >> >"too fast". > >> > > >> >It's basically the speed when you start losing fully > >> >control of your bike. > >> > >> Okay - so you agree that each of us has a "too fast," > >> yours being 50, mine being 40 and someone elses being > >> 30, right? > >> > >> I know guys whose "too fast" is 60 mph. > > > >I don't know what mine is; I hit 46 over the weekend on a > >big hill, and was hoping for 50. It felt good, and I felt > >like I was nowhere near my comfort limit. A nice solid, > >stable touring frame may have something to do with that, > >though. > > > > Has an animal run out in front of you yet? ;-) Nope; that might be a factor as well <grin>. -- Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the newsgroups if possible). |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Ben Kaufman" <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:mgqle09epd23mr4m0iqgp3ln77pbtq55h7@4ax.com... > >> >With my $99 junky bicycle, on a wide road, and great > >> >visibility, I would consider anything over 50MPH is > >> >"too fast". > >> > > >> >It's basically the speed when you start losing fully > >> >control of your bike. > >> > >> Okay - so you agree that each of us has a "too fast," > >> yours being 50, mine > >> being 40 and someone elses being 30, right? > >> > >> I know guys whose "too fast" is 60 mph. At some point you suddenly say to yourself... this is too damm fast. It happened to me on a Hill near New Glarus Wisconsin. I was feeling really amped and was on a bike tour with a bunch of other people... including some rather lovely young single women... and I had my old Raleigh Aleyska a nice following wind and a big hill... And I put it in to full power climbing up and over the hill and pumped until I put it into a full tuck. At the bottom of the hill... which lead to another hill, the bicycle was shaking and I was hestitant to apply any brakes. When I finally stopped... having coasted nearly to the top of the next big hill... I saw that my Cyclo-Computer had registered a top speed of 67 MPH.... mind you I don't know how close to accurate that was... but I do know it was way too fast... These days I am older and wiser (and frankly bicycling on pretty flat areas and no longer in good shape)... and I would say 35 MPH would be "too fast". |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
John Smith wrote:
> At some point you suddenly say to yourself... this is too > damm fast. It happened to me on a Hill near New Glarus > Wisconsin. I was feeling really These days I am older and > wiser (and frankly bicycling on pretty flat areas and no > longer in good shape)... and I would say 35 MPH would be > "too fast". I just had that feeling this last Sat. Luckily for me, my computer is dead or I'd probably have thought it sooner. My husband and I were descending Kitt Peak, fast. I was riding my Bianchi Vigorelli, and it was reaching that point where it felt "squirrely". I know we were absolutely flying. Then visions of Joseba Beloki danced in my mind and I slowed a bit, as it's hot desert right now, and a lot of tar repair strips on the road. BTW, for any of you racer types out there, what Cat would this climb have been? It's 12 miles long, goes from 2,500 ft to 7,000 feet. It would be fun to know this. The road sign gives an average grade of 8%, but there are *definately* areas where it is more and less steep. Thanks for the info. Teresa in AZ (normally starts feeling uneasy when we hit the high 30's...) |
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:11:58 -0700, Teresa Bippert-Plymate
<teresa@as.arizona.edu> wrote: > > > John Smith wrote: >> At some point you suddenly say to yourself... this is too >> damm fast. It happened to me on a Hill near New Glarus >> Wisconsin. I was feeling really These days I am older and >> wiser (and frankly bicycling on pretty flat areas and no >> longer in good shape)... and I would say 35 MPH would be >> "too fast". > > I just had that feeling this last Sat. Luckily for me, my > computer is dead or I'd probably have thought it sooner. > My husband and I were descending Kitt Peak, fast. I was > riding my Bianchi Vigorelli, and it was reaching that > point where it felt "squirrely". I know we were absolutely > flying. Then visions of Joseba Beloki danced in my mind > and I slowed a bit, as it's hot desert right now, and a > lot of tar repair strips on the road. > > BTW, for any of you racer types out there, what Cat would > this climb have been? It's 12 miles long, goes from 2,500 > ft to 7,000 feet. It would be fun to know this. The road > sign gives an average grade of 8%, but there are > *definately* areas where it is more and less steep. Thanks > for the info. > > Teresa in AZ (normally starts feeling uneasy when we hit > the high 30's...) > It's an average grade of rise/run x 100, or (7,000 - 2,500) / (12 x 5280) x 100 = 7.1 grade. I don't know what the category is, though. That's a nice ride, when it's cool. Where is this? I used to live in Phoenix. -- Bob in CT Remove ".x" to reply |
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 888
|
Not a racer, but based on the Cats from TdF mountain stages, I'd say at least a 2 but probably more like a 1 or "hors categorie"/unclassified. Then again, I don't really know much about how these are graded. I think it has to do with a combination of length, average gradient, quality of road, amount of exposure, and some other things.
It's plenty long at 12 miles, and quite steep (average of 8% gradient). Factor in the fact that you're in Arizona, which can be quite hot, and that makes for a pretty tough climb. http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/200...id=stages#climb click on the stages to see the category of the climbs. |
|
|