Why Ed Dolan is worthless!










PDA

About Cycling Forums
Why Ed Dolan is worthless!
Since 2001, over 90,000 cyclist's have joined Cycling Forums to discuss topics from general cycling to equipment, training, racing and travel or vacation destinations (especially in europe during the tour de france). We also feature an great deals in our online store, 100's of articles, classifieds and product reviews.

View Full Version : Why Ed Dolan is worthless!



The content of the Why Ed Dolan is worthless! article is:

Not Ed
Why Ed Dolan is worthless!
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes crap.

!Jones
Why Ed Dolan is worthless!
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT), in rec.bicycles.tech
RoCoach@gmail.com wrote:

>I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
>there?

Yes. They are known as "delete" buttons. Other than that, you take
your chances; however, I've not met the man who could *force* me to
read something when I had made up my mind to the contrary.

Jones

Colin Nelson
Why Ed Dolan is worthless!
"!Jones" <hi@there.org> wrote in message news:it8e54d8gultt9put43o3ds0n1kqtab75k@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT), in rec.bicycles.tech
> RoCoach@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
> >there?
>
> Yes. They are known as "delete" buttons. Other than that, you take
> your chances; however, I've not met the man who could *force* me to
> read something when I had made up my mind to the contrary.
>
> Jones
>

'Block sender' is useful ... By Jones.

!Jones
Why Ed Dolan is worthless!
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:03:03 +0100, in rec.bicycles.tech "Colin
Nelson" <colin.nelson2@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>
>"!Jones" <hi@there.org> wrote in message news:it8e54d8gultt9put43o3ds0n1kqtab75k@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT), in rec.bicycles.tech
>> RoCoach@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
>> >there?
>>
>> Yes. They are known as "delete" buttons. Other than that, you take
>> your chances; however, I've not met the man who could *force* me to
>> read something when I had made up my mind to the contrary.
>>
>> Jones
>>
>
>'Block sender' is useful ... By Jones.

I suppose. I've never used it becuase I'm not willing to admit that
*anyone* can get that far under my skin... an ex-wife, maybe, but not
an ASCII stream. Usually, they simply bore me to the point where I'm
no longer motivated to click on their messages, thus "blocking"
themselves.

Personally, I prefer someone who pisses me off and challenges my world
view, Every now and then, someone on Usenet will do so... mostly it's
mindless noise, but I read hoping someone will astound me.

Jones





cyclingforums.com | home | WWF | Wine
Website and eCommerce Solutions