Pedophilia and the Sympathethic Organized Left

Since 2001, over 90,000 cyclist's have joined Cycling Forums to discuss topics from general cycling to equipment, training, racing and travel or vacation destinations (especially in europe during the tour de france). We also feature an great deals in our online store, 100's of articles, classifieds and product reviews.

Leadership...

Bill Clinton... Sexually Abused a Subordinate Unpaid Intern in Violation of Federal Law that Protects Subordinates in the Workplace, and did so while in the Oval Office, on the phone with a Congressman discussing Troop Deployment.

Leadership...

Bill Clinton... Let a Convicted Child Molesting DemocRAT out of Prison as one of his last Cowardly Acts in Office, instead of spending his Final Four Months Focused on who hit the USS Cole... Don't even get me started on the World Trade Center Attack 8 years earlier when he let the 11th Mastermind get a way.

Leadership...

The International Lesbian and Gay Association's Ties to the North American Man Boy Love Association being Exposed in 1994... NAMBLA Marching with Homosexuals in the Liberation Movement of the 70's... Homosexuals Dressing Toddlers up in Drag at these Deviant Festivals to this day while Elected DemocRATS are Honored Speakers for the Movement.

Leadership...

House DemocRAT Leadership allowing a DemocRAT to stay in the House and be Re-Elected after ACTUALLY HAVING SEX WITH A PAGE... That DemocRAT Arrogantly turned his back when the House slapped his hand and gave him a Censure...

Leadership...

DemocRATS pushed to give Voting Rights to 16 and 14 year olds in California... I Wonder what that might do to Age of Consent Laws?...

Leadership...

The National Organization of Women waited until Mel Reynolds (D) was Convicted of Child Molestation to Request that he Resign...

Most DemocRATS took the same path, by the way.

He was Charged... No Demands of Resignation.

He was Convicted... Near Inaudible Requests that he Resign...

The Current Predatory Homosexual who happens to Reside in a District that DemocRATS can't get Elected in, RESIGNED ALREADY!

None of these Dishonest Leftists were Demanding that Tip O'Neil Resign for what he Knew about Studd's Abuse of a Page, as they now do with Hastert.

The Dishonesty is Self-Evident.

What I want to see is these same Leftists this Concerned in Mid-November if they win.

...so, this is what the great unifier from texas taught you? really bringing us together...

...so, this is what the great unifier from texas taught you? really bringing us together...Actually I forgot something,
I failed to mention in 1998 the APA released study; "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples,". In this scholarly study, these ‘experts’ concluded that “adult child sex” wasn’t necessarily bad if the child consented to, or enjoyed the adult child sexual encounter. As a matter of fact, in many cases, it ("adult child sex") was "beneficial".And lets not forget, the androgynous Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s wish that the age of consent be lowered to 12.

...so your republican "big tent" needs a bit of tailoring to include foley? or are you proving that the differences between republicans and democrats are few?

or are you proving that the differences between republicans and democrats are few?
...

And we Denounce and Remove them, not Coddle and Re-Elect them like the DemocRATS did with Studds (D), or let them out of Prison like Clinton did with Reynolds (D), or have Fireside Chats with them like Larry King did Mary Kay Letourneau with her 2nd Grade Victim.


The Difference is in how they are treated.

That difference is obvious when you look at Studds (D) and Reynolds (D) and Foley (R).

To Deny the Difference, is to Deny Reality.

...the difference is that the republicans cater to the "marginalised" until the "marginalised" begin to erode the core republican voters?... what exactly are you getting at, bluetrain? your party is..., what?, quasi-tolerant of voters you find morally reprehensible? come clean, blue train. there are few i would put inside a noose. are there any you would shove inside the noose?

...the difference is that the republicans cater to the "marginalised" until the "marginalised" begin to erode the core republican voters?... what exactly are you getting at, bluetrain? your party is..., what?, quasi-tolerant of voters you find morally reprehensible? come clean, blue train. there are few i would put inside a noose. are there any you would shove inside the noose?

There are going to be perverts and pedophiles on both sides in a system as Large as ours......

Hey slovakguy for a country that had Elected Vladimír Mečiar and Robert Fico you really do not have much to say about Republican and Democrats.


Meciar took what he could for himself and his buddies, had the president's son kidnapped. Not to mention his treatment of the Hungarian minority in Slovakia. He was a thug and you kept him in power for much too long, and now you have elected Fico who I think is really not much different than Meciar. He is trying to turn back all the progress that the country made once they got rid of Meciar. Fico cancelling public tenders for privatizing many industries for one reason so he and his buddies can enrich themselves.

I dont care who you are in inappropriate behaviour with minors is unacceptable and should be punished severly not sheltered by organization, political parties, Religions etc.

I hope you were never a HZDS supporter. You must be smart if you ride a bike so you get the benefit of the doubt.

Warning...the attached link is quite long.
Actually...it's very long.
It also has lots and lots of further links.

The Party of Family Values?
Grossly dysfunctional values.

P.S. It's "sympathetic".Not "sympathethic".
Unless you have a lithp.
Thweetie!
http://www.armchairsubversive.com/
Rick Santorum's Republican Child Molesters :) :) :)

GOP = Group of Perverts? :D :D :D

.
P.S. It's "sympathetic".Not "sympathethic".
Unless you have a lithp.
Thweetie!
:) :) :)LOL, here come the Grammar Police again. Like I told Limerickman, just make sure if you are going to start correcting typos by other posters that you at least make sure you dont make any yourself in the process.:D :D :D
I'll be watching.

This is BT's attempt at 1) making Foley's & the Repig Congress' behavior sound OK. :rolleyes: Also known as: not taking responsibility for heinous acts, Part 112.

Obfuscate, deny, lie, blame others. It just never changes with these mutants. So what else is new?

As I said in my original thread on the Foley matter (to which BT has had no reply, since there is no defense): "The Democrats did not then begin an orchestrated media campaign to blame the entire problem on ... the Repigs (or the young man, for that matter). Democrats did not take to the airwaves with talking points that were transparent lies."

Also, his attempt to 2) make above pathetic ravings sound "important" by improper capitalization of nearly every word in a sentence. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Give it up, BT. The honorable thing to do is to condemn the perverted scumbags that have done this no matter what your politics are, including each and every Congress member that had any part in covering it up, and then to scream loudly for a good house-cleaning - not to continue to defend the indefensible.

The initial frenzy was because of the age of the page. Turns out he is 18. He is still a scum, but the pretrial hanging of Foley by the Dems would seem a bit harsh since this seems to be similar to the Studds case, where very little was done to Gayry. hmmm, didnt he accually have sex with an under age male page??? (Not the Frank case, lots of sex in that one) Yes the Studds case. They are all three pigs including the recently departed Mrs Studds....Or was he the Mr.

They are all three pigs including the recently departed Mrs Studds....Or was he the Mr.LOL, who knows who wore the pants in that family but the feds for the first time will deny death benefits to the congressman's gay spouse.

As I expected, you 2 yardbirds will make up some excuse for the Repigs disgusting behavior. Unfortunately for you, trying to equate what others may have done years ago in no way exonerates Foley, Hastert, and the rest of the GOP that allowed it to happen.

Of course, one wouldn't expect any better from the bigoted redneck bluetrain.

As I expected, you 2 yardbirds will make up some excuse for the Repigs disgusting behavior. Unfortunately for you, trying to equate what others may have done years ago in no way exonerates Foley, Hastert, and the rest of the GOP that allowed it to happen.

Of course, one wouldn't expect any better from the bigoted redneck bluetrain. You missed my point. There is no excuse for Foley. There were however lots of excuses for Studds. I am confused though. I thought you lefties were ok with ass pirates like Foley and Studds. I sense a little homophobe in you?? Wait....are you a Stalin Communist.

You missed my point. There is no excuse for Foley. There were however lots of excuses for Studds. I am confused though. I thought you lefties were ok with ass pirates like Foley and Studds. I sense a little homophobe in you?? Wait....are you a Stalin Communist.So
Foley and the other gay Republicans are lefties now,are they? LOL.

So
Foley and the other gay Republicans are lefties now,are they? LOL. Quik fact check.....Nope Studds wasnt a Repub. Had sex with an under aged page. Went on to finish his career in the house without a hickup.

It's not about the Studds matter. It's not about Clinton. It's not about ACLU. It's not about whether Sam I Am likes Green Eggs & Ham.

The issue is about Foley's behavior and the Repig leadership that allowed him to continue his behavior, and the Repig's attempt to cover up their knowledge and complicity of it.

That's the issue.

It's not about the Studds matter. It's not about Clinton. It's not about ACLU. It's not about whether Sam I Am likes Green Eggs & Ham.

The issue is about Foley's behavior and the Repig leadership that allowed him to continue his behavior, and the Repig's attempt to cover up their knowledge and complicity of it.

That's the issue. I get it. However Foleys behavior , or "crime" to date can at best be described as poor judgement. At worst it would fall under sexual harrasment because the boy was 18. He is a perv that is unfit for office, but if anyone were to step in to discipline him prior to this, they would have been accused of being a homophobe. As a party the dems seem to have already set the standard for how they deal with such issues;I just dont understand the new concern the dems have regarding gay sex with an under age page it never bothered them during the Studds case