Paula Radcliffe

Since 2001, over 90,000 cyclist's have joined Cycling Forums to discuss topics from general cycling to equipment, training, racing and travel or vacation destinations (especially in europe during the tour de france). We also feature an great deals in our online store, 100's of articles, classifieds and product reviews.

what do people think of her?

i respect her anti doping stance but if you look at her performances alone,
she has improved beyond all recognition from the athlete of about6-8 years ago

she used be the brides maid of the 10000 but now dominates

athens 2004, enough said.

athens 2004, enough said.well like dead start said @ athens but the main reason for dominating is her diet.

Before she just eat correct food but had not set diet. Now she has specified time when to eat so that when she is putting miles in for training then the foods energy is used to maximum which means she can run greater distances in training which say 5 miles extra on top of what she was doing a day adds up to 25 a week which a lot maybe more depending on if she has more/less rest days than cyclists have.

well like dead start said @ athens but the main reason for dominating is her diet.

Before she just eat correct food but had not set diet. Now she has specified time when to eat so that when she is putting miles in for training then the foods energy is used to maximum which means she can run greater distances in training which say 5 miles a day adds up to 25 a week which a lot maybe more depending on if she has more/less rest days than cyclists have.
If she is only putting in 25 miles a week and is as good as she is then she has to be doping! She puts in way more then that.

If she is only putting in 25 miles a week and is as good as she is then she has to be doping! She puts in way more then that.
i meant as in she can do 5 miles extra a day not 5 miles a day